Abstract

BackgroundOn March 25th, 2015, a rapid landslide occurred upstream of the village of Gessi-Mazzalasino, in the municipality of Scandiano, affecting two buildings.Rapid landslides, due to their high velocity and mobility, can affect large areas and cause extensive damage.Considering the often unpredictable kinematics of landslides, the post-failure behavior has been studied by many authors to predict the landslide runout phase for hazard assessment.FindingsWith the aim of characterizing the Gessi-Mazzalasino landslide, field surveys were integrated with the results of laboratory tests. The geometric characteristics (thickness, area and volume) and kinematic aspects of the landslide were estimated by using a laser scanning survey and geomorphological data.To model the landslide and obtain its rheological parameters, a back analysis of the event was performed by means of a depth-averaged 3D numerical code called DAN3D. The results of the back analysis of the landslide propagation were validated with field surveys and velocity estimations along selected sections of the landslide.Finally, potential areas prone to failure or reactivation were identified, and a new simulation was performed that considered the back-calculated rheological parameters.ConclusionsRapid landslides are one of the most dangerous natural hazards and are one of the most frequent natural disasters in the world. Therefore, prediction of post-failure motion is an essential component of hazard assessment when a potential source of a mobile landslide it is located.To assess the risk affecting the area, both numerical and empirical methods have been proposed, in order to predict the runout phase of the phenomenon.For the numerical modelling of the landslide, carried out with DAN-3D code, the best results were obtained by using a Voellmy reological model, with a constant turbulence parameter (ξ) of 250 m/s2 and a friction parameter (μ) comprised between 0.15 and 0.19.The rheological parameters obtained through dynamic back analyses were used to evaluate the propagation phase and the deposition areas of new potential landslides, that could affect the same area of the 25th March 2015 event.The predicted runout length obtained by the DAN3D software was compared to runout lengths predicted by the Corominas (Can Geotech J 33:260–271, 1996), (Nat. Hazards 19, 47-77) and (UNICIV Report, R-416, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, UNSW, Sydney Australia 2003) empirical relations.All the data confirm that the impact area of possible future events will be smaller than the 2015 event, probably due to the safety measures established after the landslide.

Highlights

  • Rapid landslides such as debris flows, debris avalanches, rock avalanches and flow slides are instability phenomena that affect superficial deposits as a consequence of intense and prolonged rainfall events

  • Prediction of post-failure motion is an essential component of hazard assessment when a potential source of a mobile landslide it is located

  • The rheological parameters obtained through dynamic back analyses were used to evaluate the propagation phase and the deposition areas of new potential landslides, that could affect the same area of the 25th March 2015 event

Read more

Summary

Conclusions

Rapid landslides represent one of the most dangerous natural hazards and are one of the most frequent natural disasters in the world. Prediction of post-failure motion is an essential component of hazard assessment when a potential source of a mobile landslide can be located. To assess the risk affecting the area, different methods have been proposed to predict the runout phase of the phenomenon. The dynamic modeling was carried out by using the DAN3D code, which estimated the extent of the impact area and mapped the distribution of landslide parameters. To obtain more information about the 2015 landslide, the flow velocity was calculated along four cross sections by means of the superelevation of the debris surface in the channel belt (Johnson & Rondine, 1984) and the Poiseuille equation methods. The methodology presented in this paper could become a standard procedure in areas affected by different types of flow-like landslides, providing a complete description of hazards

Introduction
Findings and Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call