Abstract
The fatigue design life of welded joints in steel structures is increasingly assessed by using numerical models and methods, such as the structural (hot-spot) stress method and the effective notch stress method. When compared to the classical design approach using nominal stress S-N design curves, these methods offer the advantage of flexibility and a wider scope of application. However, a number of questions arise when these methods are used to assess geometrically "imperfect" welded joints, such as joints with plate misalignments or excessive weld convexity or concavity. In these cases, the classical S-N curves are known to cover imperfections up to the common tolerance classes for fatigue-prone welded joints (e.g. in accordance with ISO 5817 class B). For the numerical methods, differing and conflicting recommendations exist on how to account for the geometric imperfections in the welded joints, with little or no background to these recommendations available. In this paper, a study is presented in which two standard welded joints (butt welds between plates of equal and unequal thickness; T-joints with fillet welds) are analysed with the help of the structural (hot-spot) stress and the effective notch stress approach, considering various levels of geometric imperfection up to the tolerance limits, and the resulting fatigue life predictions are compared to test results from the literature and the nominal stress approach predictions. Since the nominal stress approach curves are based on reliable statistical data and desired survival probabilities for these known, standard cases, this methodology allows one to determine the correct application of the numerical methods to cases with geometric imperfections. This information may be used for a pertinent refinement of design recommendations for these methods, as well as for cases where these methods are applied to fitness-for-purpose assessments - e.g. because the nominal stress approach is not applicable.
Highlights
Fatigue Design Methods, FAT classes, S–N curvesStress calculations using Finite Element Method (FEM) modelling and analysis techniques are increasingly common in the assessment and design of welded joints against fatigue failure
Since the focus of this paper is put on the effect of weld misalignment and other geometric imperfections, the results presented in this paper may be helpful when these numerical methods are applied to fitness-for-purpose analyses of welds for which the specified tolerance limits are exceeded
A study was presented in which two standard welded joints were analysed with the help of the structural stress and the effective notch stress approach, considering various levels of geometric imperfection up to the tolerance limits, and the resulting fatigue life predictions were compared to the nominal stress approach predictions
Summary
Fatigue Design Methods, FAT classes, S–N curves. Stress calculations using Finite Element Method (FEM) modelling and analysis techniques are increasingly common in the assessment and design of welded joints against fatigue failure. The possibility of realistically representing the geometry of the weld, as well as the surrounding joint area, thereby eliminates a large amount of the uncertainty inherent in the traditional design approaches for fatigue, which are based on beam-theoretical, nominal stresses in the vicinity of the welded joint, but do not reflect the actual stress state at the joint. In the traditional method, called the nominal stress approach in the literature, the differences in fatigue performance between the multitude of possible. Numerical methods for the fatigue assessment of welded joints
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
