Abstract

A pre-existing plane of weakness along the fault is comprised of a particular pattern of joints dipping at different orientations. The fault stress state, partially defined by the orientation of fault, determines the potential of slip failure and hence the evolution of fault permeability. Here the influence of fault orientation on permeability evolution was investigated by direct fluid injection inside fault with three different sets of fault orientations (45°, 60° and 110°), through the coupled hydromechanical (H-M) model TOUGHREACT-FLAC3D. The influence of joints pattern on slip tendency and magnitude of potential induced seismicity was also evaluated by comparing the resulted slip distance and timing. The simulation results revealed that decreasing the dip angle of the fault increases the corresponding slip tendency in the normal fault circumstance. Also, with changing joints dip angle associated with the fault, the tendency of the fault slip changes concurrently with the permeability evolution in a noticeable manner. Permeability enhancement after the onset of fault slip was observed with the three sets of fault angles, while the condition of 60° dipping angle resulted in highest enhancement. Joints pattern with a dip angle of 145° (very high dip) and 30° (very low dip) did not trigger a shear slip with seismic permeability enhancement. However, high dip and intermediate dip angles (135°, 50° and 70°) yielded high permeability in varying orders of magnitude. The large stress excitation and increasing permeability during shear deformation was noticeably high in intermediate joint dip angles but decreases as the angle increases.Article highlightsThe magnitude of injection-induced permeability enhancement is largely influenced by the fault and joint spatial orientations.With a slight change in the joint direction, there is an increasing possibility for fault to approach a different critical state of failure.Stress elevation at the point of failure is controlled by the orientations of fault/joint planes with respect to the direction of maximum principal stress.

Highlights

  • The quest for enhanced recovery from tight reservoirs requires a detailed study of several factors such as reservoir quality, natural fracture networks, orientation of the fractures, geomechanical properties of the matrix rock and fractures

  • Faults and fractures are the main targets in field development plan that enable production in naturally fractured reservoirs or induced hydraulic fractures in tight reservoirs, which practically makes fault permeability evolution study a crucial investigation in production optimization (Nelson 1985)

  • Effective stress and shear stress magnitudes are greater at lower fault orientations as 45° [ 60° [ 110° (Fig. 4d–e), and stress drop was highest at fault angle of 45°

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The quest for enhanced recovery from tight reservoirs requires a detailed study of several factors such as reservoir quality, natural fracture networks, orientation of the fractures, geomechanical properties of the matrix rock and fractures. Because of the role played by fault orientations in the stress field analysis, variations in fault permeability with respect to the changing fracture/joint orientations can be explained through numerical simulations An example of these studies was earlier presented by Jacquey et al (2015), demonstrating how the angle of fault influences the initial slip tendency and dynamic permeability evolution. The reservoir model is presented as a finite medium with a hydraulically induced normal fault, and the overall mechanical behaviour of fault is represented by a set of solid elements with ubiquitous joints which are oriented as weak planes in the fault zone as described by Cappa and Rutqvist (2011) We investigate how their relationship could modify the poroelastic response of the fault under undrained simulation conditions.

Stress theory
Fault permeability and aperture evolution
Mechanism of shear failure and seismic slip
Estimating seismic magnitude
Model analysis
36 Page 8 of 23
Simulation scenarios
Results and discussion
Effect of fault orientation
36 Page 12 of 23
36 Page 14 of 23
36 Page 18 of 23
Slip distance analysis
Conclusions
36 Page 22 of 23
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call