Abstract

The accurate prediction of the performances of axial water turbines and naval propellers is a challenging task, of great practical relevance. In this paper a numerical prediction strategy, based on the combination of a trusted CFD solver and a calibrated mass transfer model, is applied to the turbulent flow in axial turbines and around a model scale naval propeller, under non-cavitating and cavitating conditions. Some selected results for axial water turbines and a marine propeller, and in particular the advantages, in terms of accuracy and fidelity, of ScaleResolving Simulations (SRS), like SAS (Scale Adaptive Simulation) and Zonal-LES (ZLES) compared to standard RANS approaches, are presented. Efficiency prediction for a Kaplan and a bulb turbine was significantly improved by use of the SAS SST model in combination with the ZLES in the draft tube. Size of cavitation cavity and sigma break curve for Kaplan turbine were successfully predicted with SAS model in combination with robust high resolution scheme, while for mass transfer the Zwart model with calibrated constants were used. The results obtained for a marine propeller in non-uniform inflow, under cavitating conditions, compare well with available experimental measurements, and proved that a mass transfer model, previously calibrated for RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes), can be successfully applied also within the SRS approaches.

Highlights

  • CFD has been a useful tool for flow analysis and efficiency prediction of axial turbines and marine propellers for more than 20 years

  • Turbulence models and discretisation schemes In the analysis reported in this paper, several turbulence models were used: the SST model [5], the SAS SST [6] and the ZLES model [7]

  • Concluding remarks On the basis of the detailed analysis of flow in a Kaplan turbine and in a bulb turbine by different turbulence models, and a marine propeller with non-uniform inflow under cavitating conditions, the following conclusions can be drawn:. For both Kaplan and bulb turbines, it was found out that steady state analysis is not suitable for all operating regimes

Read more

Summary

Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience

This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more. Download details: IP Address: 140.105.48.10 This content was downloaded on 13/04/2016 at 09:55 Please note that terms and conditions apply

Introduction
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
Draft tube Draft tube prolongation Total
Findings
Guide vane Runner
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call