Abstract
AbstractMany attempts have been made to investigate the energy budgets of stick‐slip events, however, the strain energy contribution is still poorly understood. We developed a discrete element method (DEM)‐based method to mimic stick‐slip events and the associated energy partitioning. We found that stress drop Δσ, breakdown energy EG, and strain energy release ΔU scale with slip δc as , , and , respectively, which is quantitatively consistent with data from manmade seismicity and natural earthquakes. We observed two different slip‐weakening behavior patterns: one without a postseismic phase (Type I) and one containing a postseismic phase (Type II). We show that ΔU contributes 20%∼90% (63% on average) and 10% ∼ 60% (38% on average) to the total energy budget for Type I and Type II events, respectively. Formations that store higher strain energy play a more vital role in the earthquake energy budget, regardless of the distance to the fault.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.