Numerical assessment of TMS 402/602-22 and CSA S304-14 seismic design provisions for partially grouted reinforced masonry shear walls failing in flexure

Abstract

Despite the economic benefits of using partially grouted reinforced masonry shear walls (PG-RMSWs) as a seismic force resisting system (SFRS) in low-rise buildings, using such a system in mid- and high-rise buildings is still questionable. This is because the literature lacks comprehensive studies investigating different seismic design provisions adopted for rectangular and flanged PG-RMSWs of aspect ratios greater than 2.0 and failing in flexure. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive numerical assessment of the seismic design provisions of the North American masonry standards (i.e., TMS 402/602–22 and CSA S304–14) for designing different categories of rectangular and flanged PG-RMSWs failing in flexure. In this regard, 108 PG-RMSWs were designed and modeled using the Extreme Loading for Structures (ELS) software. Afterward, some changes were proposed to the current seismic design provisions in CSA S304–14 and TMS 402/602–22 for rectangular and flanged PG-RMSWs. In addition, a comparison was made between the seismic design provisions for PG-RMSWs and FG-RMSWs, designed according to each RMSW category, to investigate the expected differences in the behavior based on the applied seismic design provisions. Accordingly, additional 36 FG-RMSWs were designed according to CSA S304–14 and TMS 402/602–22. These additional walls were then modeled on the ELS and compared with their PG counterparts. The results show that both standards can be safely used to design rectangular and flanged PG-RMSWs only when using the two proposed provisions for each standard. For CSA S304–14, the possibility of updating clause 16.8.5.2 is concluded, allowing the use of PG-RMSWs without limitations. New seismic force modification factors were also proposed for TMS 402/602–22 for the design of rectangular and flanged PG-RMSWs. Finally, the comparison between rectangular PG and FG-RMSWs failing in flexure and designed according to CSA S304–14 and TMS 402/602–22 shows that the behavior of PG-RMSWs failing in flexure is comparable to FG-RMSWs under certain circumstances. This study is considered a significant step to prove the potential for more economical and safe usage of PG-RMSWs in mid- and high-rise buildings.