Abstract

Short Retraction Notice There are some errors in the discussion and conclusion part. This article has been retracted to straighten the academic record. In making this decision the Editorial Board follows COPE's Retraction Guidelines. Aim is to promote the circulation of scientific research by offering an ideal research publication platform with due consideration of internationally accepted standards on publication ethics. The Editorial Board would like to extend its sincere apologies for any inconvenience this retraction may have caused. The full retraction notice in PDF is preceding the original paper which is marked "RETRACTED".

Highlights

  • All authorsInstitution: Reader: Other: Date initiative is launched: Retraction type (multiple responses allowed): Unreliable findings

  • In the hypothetical case of a severe accident, the reactor core could melt and form a mixture, called corium and can relocate to the lower plenum of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) and form an in-vessel debris bed [1]

  • The current paper demonstrates the simulation case utilized for investigating the effect of Prandtl number (Pr) number on melt pool thermal hydraulics by applying Phase-change Effective Convectivity Model (PECM) (Section 2) with their thermo-physical properties as input for modelling for both single and double layer melt pool configuration (Section 3)

Read more

Summary

All authors

Institution: Reader: Other: Date initiative is launched: Retraction type (multiple responses allowed): Unreliable findings. Copyright infringement Other legal concern: Editorial reasons Handling error. X Other: there are some errors in the discussion and conclusion part. Author's conduct (only one response allowed): honest error academic misconduct X none (not applicable in this case – e.g. in case of editorial reasons). History Expression of Concern: yes, date: yyyy-mm-dd X no Correction: yes, date: yyyy-mm-dd X no Comment: There are some errors in the discussion and conclusion part. This article has been retracted to straighten the academic record. In making this decision the Editorial Board follows COPE's Retraction Guidelines. The Editorial Board would like to extend its sincere apologies for any inconvenience this retraction may have caused.

Introduction
Computational Domain
Implementation of the PECM Model
Physical Properties of Simulant Materials and Test Matrices
Benchmark Test of PECM against ANSYS CFD
C applied Side and top walls
Validation
E Parameter
Results & Discussion
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.