Abstract
In the present article, we follow up our recent work on the experimental assessment of two data-driven nonlinear system identification methodologies. The first methodology constructs a single nonlinear-mode model from periodic vibration data obtained under phase-controlled harmonic excitation. The second methodology constructs a state-space model with polynomial nonlinear terms from vibration data obtained under uncontrolled broadband random excitation. The conclusions drawn from our previous work (experimental) were limited by uncertainties inherent to the specimen, instrumentation, and signal processing. To avoid these uncertainties in the present work, we pursued a completely numerical approach based on synthetic measurement data obtained from simulated experiments. Three benchmarks are considered, which feature geometric, unilateral contact, and dry friction nonlinearity, respectively. As in our previous work, we assessed the prediction accuracy of the identified models with a focus on the regime near a particular resonance. This way, we confirmed our findings on the strengths and weaknesses of the two methodologies and derive several new findings: First, the state-space method struggles even for polynomial nonlinearities if the training data is chaotic. Second, the polynomial state-space models can reach high accuracy only in a rather limited range of vibration levels for systems with non-polynomial nonlinearities. Such cases demonstrate the sensitivity to training data inherent in the method, as model errors are inevitable here. Third, although the excitation does not perfectly isolate the nonlinear mode (exciter-structure interaction, uncontrolled higher harmonics, local instead of distributed excitation), the modal properties are identified with high accuracy.
Highlights
The high demand for saving resources and avoiding emissions in recent years has led manufacturers to make increasing use of lightweight design
Near-resonant frequency responses obtained directly from the benchmark (Duffing oscillator without shaker), the Nonlinear Modal-Reduced Order Model (NM-ROM) and the polynomial nonlinear state-space (PNLSS) model trained at excitation level (a) 0.01 N, (b) 0.50 N, (c) 0.75 N
As one may expect from the unsuccessful training, the PNLSS models trained with phase-locked loop (PLL) data yield lower accuracy as compared with the initial ones, see Figure 13 and compare with Figure 11b,c
Summary
The high demand for saving resources and avoiding emissions in recent years has led manufacturers to make increasing use of lightweight design. The present interest, in particular, is focused on system identification techniques that can be used for the study of mechanical systems with nonlinearities that “perturb” linear resonances in an amplitude-dependent fashion Common examples of such systems include thin beams, plates, and shells undergoing large amplitude vibrations (see Reference [6] for a relatively recent review); nonlinear vibrations of jointed structures with contact and frictional nonlinearities (see Reference [7] for perspectives); etc. The purpose of the present work was to address these open questions, by resorting to synthetic measurement data obtained from simulated experiments This way, the actual mathematical form of the nonlinearity is known and an unspoiled (noise, system variability, measurement uncertainty) reference for the modal properties becomes available.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.