Abstract

The striving for energy savings by lightweight construction requires the combination of different materials with advantageous properties. For joining sheet metal components, clinching offers a good alternative to thermal joining processes. In contrast to thermal joining processes, the microstructure in the joining zone remains largely unaffected. Conventional clinch joints, however, have a protrusion on the underside of the joint, which restricts their use in functional and visible surfaces. Flat-clinching minimizes this disadvantage by using a flat anvil instead of a die. Due to the flatness on the underside, it can be used in visible and functional surfaces. This paper deals with the increase of joint strength by using an auxiliary joining element (AJE) in the second forming stage. To achieve optimum improvement in the joint strength of an aluminum Al99.5 H14 sheet metal joint and to save costs, the AJE was varied numerically in terms of volume, material and basic shape. The geometric parameters (e.g., interlocking f and neck thickness tn) do not allow direct derivation of the joint strength. For this reason, the 2D clinch model was extended for the first time to include 3D load models (cross tension, shear tension). To validate the numerical results, optimized flat-clinch joints with AJE and the associated load tests were implemented experimentally. The numerical models were used to improve the process development.

Highlights

  • By combining advantageous properties of different materials, energy can be saved in the sense of lightweight construction

  • This paper deals with the increase of joint strength by using an auxiliary joining element (AJE)

  • The AJE was varied in terms of its volume, material selection and shape, and the influence on joint strength was investigated numerically

Read more

Summary

Introduction

By combining advantageous properties of different materials, energy can be saved in the sense of lightweight construction. To avoid the occurrence of the anvil-side protrusion while at the same time influencing the material flow in such a way that an interlocking is formed within the material plane, relatively high blank holder forces are required. Kumma et al investigated the blank holder force and the edge radius of the blank holder [8] Both parameters influence the interlocking f and the neck thickness tn of the joint. Sabra Atia and Jain analyzed the effects of tool parameters such as blank holder contour and the influence of process parameters on the material flow behavior of dieless clinch joints. They evaluated the effects in relation to joint strength [9]. The numerical analysis complements experimental investigations at low cost and reduces the need for expensive prototypes and experiments [11]

Reference test and calibration
Simulation model description
Parameter variation
Volume variation
Material variation
Variation of the basic shape
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call