Abstract
Experimental measurement still plays an important role in indoor airflow study. To obtain three-dimensional and high-quality experimental data in building's indoor airflow study, Particle Tracking Velocimetry (PTV) and Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) have been increasingly used. The accuracy and precision of measurement technologies is always a crucial issue. This paper first numerically compares the measuring performance of 3D PTV and typical 2D PIV algorithms on three laminar macro scale flows of known displacement, as a function of the particle tracking density defined as the ratio of mean particle spacing to mean particle displacement. Then, 3D PTV and 2D PIV results are compared using an experimental low-turbulence indoor airflow generated by a low-speed tailpipe. Results suggest that when the tracking density is smaller than two, 3D PTV generally cannot yield reliable measurement results. As the tracking density increases, 3D PTV has a better ability to measure larger displacement than PIV.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
