Abstract

SUMMARYThe preparation, initiation and occurrence dynamics of earthquakes in Italy are governed by several frequently unknown physical mechanisms and parameters. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing new techniques and approaches for earthquake monitoring and hazard assessments. Here, we develop a first-order numerical model simulating quasi-static crustal interseismic loading, coseismic brittle episodic dislocation and post-seismic relaxation for extensional and compressional earthquakes in Italy based on a common framework of lithostatic and tectonic forces. Our model includes an upper crust, where the fault is locked, and a deep crust, where the fault experiences steady shear.The results indicate that during the interseismic phase, the contrasting behaviour between the upper locked fault segment and lower creeping fault segment generates a stretched volume at depth in the hangingwall via extensional tectonics while a contracted volume forms via compressional tectonics. The interseismic stress and strain gradients invert at the coseismic stage, with the interseismic dilated volume contracting during the coseismic stage, and vice versa. Moreover, interseismic stress gradients promote coseismic gravitational subsidence of the hangingwall for normal fault earthquakes and elastic uplift for reverse fault earthquakes. Finally, the post-seismic relaxation is characterized by further ground subsidence and uplift for normal and reverse faulting earthquakes, respectively, which is consistent with the faulting style. The fault is the passive feature, with slipping generating the seismic waves, whereas the energy activating the movement is stored mostly in the hangingwall volume. The main source of energy for normal faulting and thrust is provided by the lithostatic load and elastic load, respectively.

Highlights

  • The present-day geodynamic setting of the Apennines is related to the ‘westward’ subduction of the Adriatic plate beneath peninsular Italy (Carminati & Doglioni 2012; Carminati et al 2012)

  • The fault segments that simulate the L’Aquila 2009 and Norcia 2016 earthquakes are located in an extensional tectonic field, while the fault segment that simulates the Emilia 2012 event falls in a compressional field (Figs S7a and b, Supporting Information)

  • We contributed to the current understanding of the evolution of stress and strain in the interseismic, coseismic and post-seismic phases associated with a single fault segment by developing a faultscale numerical model that allowed us to jointly simulate long-term crustal interseismic loading, coseismic brittle episodic dislocation, and post-seismic relaxation for typical normal and reverse faulting earthquakes in Italy based on a single framework of gravitational and tectonic forces

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present-day geodynamic setting of the Apennines is related to the ‘westward’ subduction of the Adriatic plate beneath peninsular Italy (Carminati & Doglioni 2012; Carminati et al 2012). Extensional tectonics characterizes the central and northern Apennines, whereas crustal shortening characterizes the Po plain and the Adriatic foreland (Chiarabba et al 2015; Devoti et al 2017). This tectonic setting is typical of subduction zones where the slab hinge moves away with respect to the upper plate (Doglioni et al 2007), generating a low topography shallow accretionary prism above the slab hinge and a contemporaneous rifting in the hangingwall of the subduction characterized by higher topography (Doglioni et al 1999). High topography favours extensional seismicity whereas low topography favours contractional seismicity due to the opposite sign of

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call