Abstract

Spray-applied membranes for waterproofing of sprayed concrete tunnels have led to the possibility of shear transfer between primary and secondary linings through the membrane interface, with the potential for reducing overall lining thickness. Laboratory tests have shown a reasonable degree of composite action in beam specimens. In this study, a numerical model previously calibrated against such tests is applied to a whole tunnel, considering soil–structure interaction and staged lining construction. The model shows composite action, and load sharing between the lining layers is expected in the tunnel as in the beams. Parametric studies over the practical range of interface stiffness values show that composite action is maintained, although at high interface stiffness, excessive bending may be imposed on the secondary lining, requiring additional reinforcement. An efficient composite shell design with minimal additional reinforcement is achievable if the secondary lining thickness is reduced as compared to current practice. Robustness of the system, measured in terms of the interface’s ability to transfer stress under unequal loading causing distortion on the tunnel, is found to be generally adequate. However, adjacent construction in close proximity may provide insufficient margin on membrane tensile de-bonding, particularly if the membrane is partially or fully saturated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.