Abstract

Invasive bigheaded carp are advancing up the Upper Mississippi River by passing through its locks-and-dams (LDs). Although these structures already impede fish passage, this role could be greatly enhanced by modifying how their spillway gates operate, adding deterrent systems to their locks, and removing carp. This study examined this possibility using numeric modeling and empirical data, which evaluated all three options on an annual basis in both single LDs and pairs under different river flow conditions. Over 100 scenarios were modeled. While all three approaches showed promise, ranging from 8% to 73% reductions in how many carp pass a single LD, when employed together at pairs of LDs, upstream movement rates of invasive carp could be reduced 98–99% from current levels. Although modifying spillway gate operation is the least expensive option, its efficacy drops at high flows, so lock deterrents and/or removal using fishing/trapping are required to move towards complete blockage. Improved deterrent efficacy could also offset the need for more efficient removal. This model could help prioritize research and management actions for containing carp.

Highlights

  • Introduction and MiniReviewThe spread of invasive fish has contributed to the extirpation of many species of fish as well as a loss of biodiversity and ecosystem integrity across the globe [1,2,3]

  • The structured fish passage model (S-fish passage model (FPM)) model examined 4 hydrologic scenarios in the Upper Mississippi River (UMR) and which we describe as monthly exceedance values

  • To estimate the likelihood of carp passing through LD spillway gates, we used the fish passage indices (FPI) we developed earlier [28] for silver carp at LD 8

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction and MiniReviewThe spread of invasive fish has contributed to the extirpation of many species of fish as well as a loss of biodiversity and ecosystem integrity across the globe [1,2,3]. We use numerical models to evaluate three control options for invasive bighead carp, Hypophthalmichthys nobilis, and silver carp, H. molitrix, (collectively known as bigheaded carp) at the locks-and-dams (LD) they must pass to move upstream in a large river. Our findings describe several promising ways that a targeted and integrated approach can effectively control an important invasive fish. In this introduction, we review the bigheaded carp problem, Mississippi River LDs, and three ways to control bigheaded carp at these choke points; we outline our study objectives and approach before proceeding to the methods. This model simulated passage of carp to examine ways it could be reduced It examined many options at both single and consecutive LDs using known carp passage rates, monthly river discharge, several levels of lock deterrent systems, fish size, and different levels of removal. We use changes in fish passage rate as our metric, given the absence of data on silver carp population size in the upper reaches of the UMR

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call