Abstract

33 university students listened to a 5-min. ambiguous narrative about a young boy (The Billy Story) while another 33 students did not. At the end of the final examination for the course the students were promised a 2% bonus mark if they could reconstruct the details of the story. Whereas only one student who heard the story could not recall any details, 30% of the students (n = 9) who never heard the story generated a false one. The numbers of accurate details recalled by those who heard the story decreased linearly with the time (5 through 30 days). Five times the numbers of the women than men who heard the story attributed the young boy's anomalous experience to sexual abuse.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call