Abstract

Interest and enthusiasm, regarding the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), continues to grow among clinicians in multiple medical specialties. Ultrasound machines technology has advanced to allow for smaller, even handheld machines. Integration of automated imaging technology has made these machines more user-friendly. However, one of the concerns with the widespread availability of POCUS is the overuse and misuse of this technology. In order to maximize the clinical impact of POCUS, this manuscript seeks to discuss a novel concept called the “Number needed to scan” (NNS). The NNS is an expression of the number of POCUS examinations needed to be performed to attain a benefit to the patient or to prevent an adverse outcome of a procedure. NNS serves a dual purpose: it can help clinicians understand the magnitude of clinical impact when they apply POCUS, and it can help clinicians explain this magnitude in layman terms to their patients. In this manuscript, we have focused our NNS calculations on landmark articles in three major categories: change in management; safety and accuracy; and catching a missed diagnosis. As clinicians seek to be good stewards of POCUS, NNS should be a concept used to consider which patients will be most likely to benefit from a clinician performed ultrasound.

Highlights

  • Interest in the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), continues to grow among clinicians in multiple medical specialties

  • Clinicians have demonstrated a benchmark transition from “how good we are with performing POCUS” to “how effective POCUS is in different clinical applications.”

  • As clinicians seek to be good stewards of POCUS, Number needed to scan” (NNS) should be a concept used to consider which patients will be most likely to benefit from a clinician performed ultrasound

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interest in the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), continues to grow among clinicians in multiple medical specialties. Where there was roughly a 24% rate of discordance between clinician examination and POCUS results [10] Using this information, the ARR is 24%, and the number needed to scan to change the management plans in pediatric soft tissue infections was four. In scenarios where a clinician had made the decision not to perform an arthrocentesis by clinical assessment alone, POCUS demonstrated a drainable joint effusion and changed the management plan to perform the arthrocentesis in 69% of the cases [3] Using this information, the ARR is 69%, and the number needed to scan to discover a need for surgical consultation is one. POCUS can make an impact in one patient having a PTX every two times POCUS is used in this patient population

Discussion
Conclusions
Findings
Disclosures
Cordell WH
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call