Abstract

SummaryWith the growth of the field of industrial ecology (IE), research and results have increased significantly leading to a desire for better utilization of the accumulated data in more sophisticated analyses. This implies the need for greater transparency, accessibility, and reusability of IE data, paralleling the considerable momentum throughout the sciences. The Data Transparency Task Force (DTTF) was convened by the governing council of the International Society for Industrial Ecology in late 2016 to propose best‐practice guidelines and incentives for sharing data. In this article, the members of the DTTF present an overview of developments toward transparent and accessible data within the IE community and more broadly. We argue that increased transparency, accessibility, and reusability of IE data will enhance IE research by enabling more detailed and reproducible research, and also facilitate meta‐analyses. These benefits will make the results of IE work more timely. They will enable independent verification of results, thus increasing their credibility and quality. They will also make the uptake of IE research results easier within IE and in other fields as well as by decision makers and sustainability practitioners, thus increasing the overall relevance and impact of the field. Here, we present two initial actions intended to advance these goals: (1) a minimum publication requirement for IE research to be adopted by the Journal of Industrial Ecology; and (2) a system of optional data openness badges rewarding journal articles that contain transparent and accessible data. These actions will help the IE community to move toward data transparency and accessibility. We close with a discussion of potential future initiatives that could build on the minimum requirements and the data openness badge system.

Highlights

  • This supporting information includes information on the Data Transparency Task Force mandate (SI1), examples for transparent publications in IE (SI2), results from a survey about data openness conducted by the JIE and DTTF (S13) and a discussion of procedural transparency and workflow automation in IE (SI4)

  • This is the text of the mandate given by the governing council of the International Society for Industrial Ecology for the Data Transparency Task Force (DTTF)

  • Research results of the different members are ‘incompatible’ to one another, limiting comparability and building upon previous work. This lack of properly formatted, documented, and comparable data is nowhere more evident than in the most detailed and focused on IE methods, life cycle assessment, where longstanding efforts have not lead to work that can be contributed to the IPCC assessment process

Read more

Summary

Nullius in Verba

Citation for published version: Hertwich, E, Heeren, N, Kuczenski, B, Majeau-Bettez, G, Myers, RJ, Pauliuk, S, Stadler, K & Lifset, R 2018, 'Nullius in Verba', Journal of Industrial Ecology. This supporting information includes information on the Data Transparency Task Force mandate (SI1), examples for transparent publications in IE (SI2), results from a survey about data openness conducted by the JIE and DTTF (S13) and a discussion of procedural transparency and workflow automation in IE (SI4). This is the text of the mandate given by the governing council of the International Society for Industrial Ecology for the Data Transparency Task Force (DTTF)

Documentation and publication of industrial ecology data
Bulk data
Journal publications and technical reports
Where do you see the main responsibility for data openness?
Need to combine open data with open access
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call