Abstract

Abstract. The Whistler Aerosol and Cloud Study (WACS 2010), included intensive measurements of trace gases and particles at two sites on Whistler Mountain. Between 6–11 July 2010 there was a sustained high-pressure system over the region with cloud-free conditions and the highest temperatures of the study. During this period, the organic aerosol concentrations rose from <1 μg m−3 to ∼6 μg m−3. Precursor gas and aerosol composition measurements show that these organics were almost entirely of secondary biogenic nature. Throughout 6–11 July, the anthropogenic influence was minimal with sulfate concentrations <0.2 μg m−3 and SO2 mixing ratios ≈ 0.05–0.1 ppbv. Thus, this case provides excellent conditions to probe the role of biogenic secondary organic aerosol in aerosol microphysics. Although SO2 mixing ratios were relatively low, box-model simulations show that nucleation and growth may be modeled accurately if Jnuc = 3 × 10−7[H2SO4] and the organics are treated as effectively non-volatile. Due to the low condensation sink and the fast condensation rate of organics, the nucleated particles grew rapidly (2–5 nm h−1) with a 10–25% probability of growing to CCN sizes (100 nm) in the first two days as opposed to being scavenged by coagulation with larger particles. The nucleated particles were observed to grow to ∼200 nm after three days. Comparisons of size-distribution with CCN data show that particle hygroscopicity (κ) was ∼0.1 for particles larger 150 nm, but for smaller particles near 100 nm the κ value decreased near midway through the period from 0.17 to less than 0.06. In this environment of little anthropogenic influence and low SO2, the rapid growth rates of the regionally nucleated particles – due to condensation of biogenic SOA – results in an unusually high efficiency of conversion of the nucleated particles to CCN. Consequently, despite the low SO2, nucleation/growth appear to be the dominant source of particle number.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric aerosols affect climate directly by scattering and absorbing radiation and indirectly by influencing cloud properties (Forster et al, 2007)

  • Whether or not a particle acts as a cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) depends on its size, composition and the maximum supersaturation of water reached within the cloud

  • We explore the nature of the observed newparticle formation events and use clues from measured meteorology and chemistry at Whistler as well as information regarding new-particle formation at other locations to better understand the cause of these events

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric aerosols affect climate directly by scattering and absorbing radiation and indirectly by influencing cloud properties (Forster et al, 2007) This indirect effect of aerosols on clouds occurs because cloud droplets form on an atmospheric particles. Increasing aerosol concentrations increases cloud droplet number concentrations and leads to clouds that are more reflective to sunlight (Twomey, 1977) and with potentially longer lifetimes (Albrecht, 1989). Both the direct and indirect effect of aerosols on climate represent the largest uncertainties in radiative forcing change that were quantified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Forster et al, 2007). For moderate cloud supersaturations of 0.2 %, hygroscopic aerosols roughly 80 nm and larger will act as CCN, Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call