Abstract

The slowing down of energetic ions in materials is determined by the nuclear and electronic stopping powers. Both of these have been studied extensively for ordinary-matter ions. For antiprotons, however, there are numerous studies of the electronic stopping power, but none of the nuclear stopping power. Here, we use quantum-chemical methods to calculate interparticle potentials between antiprotons and different atoms, and derive from these the nuclear stopping power of antiprotons in solids. The results show that the antiproton nuclear stopping powers are much stronger than those of protons, and can also be stronger than the electronic stopping power at the lowest energies. The interparticle potentials are also implemented in a molecular dynamics ion range calculation code, which allows us to simulate antiproton transmission through degrader foil materials. Foil transmission simulations carried out at experimentally relevant conditions show that the choice of antiproton-atom interaction model has a large effect on the predicted yield of antiprotons slowed down to low (a few keV) energies.

Highlights

  • The production of stable antihydrogen atoms relies on the slowing down of antiprotons pwith initial energies of the order of MeVs or keVs to thermal energies [1]

  • The slowing down of ions in matter is conventionally described with the stopping power S, i.e., the energy loss of an energetic particle per path length traveled in the solid [6,7,8,9] [ called in some contexts the linear energy transfer (LET) [10] ]

  • The stopping power can be separated into nuclear (Sn), electronic (Se), and nuclear reaction (Snr) contributions, S = Sn + Se + Snr [6,8,11,12,13,14]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The production of stable antihydrogen atoms relies on the slowing down of antiprotons pwith initial energies of the order of MeVs or keVs to thermal energies [1]. To get the spatial description of the pathway of an energetic ion in the material, one can use the binary collision approximation (BCA) [22,23,24,25] or molecular dynamics (MD) ion range simulations [26,27,28]. These computational approaches require the interaction potential between the atoms of the ion lattice as input data [29].

The interparticle potential of antiprotons
Comparison of polarizability values with experiments
Literature
Description of potentials with screening functions
Exponential screening function φexp
Screening function with limiting power-law behavior φep
ELECTRONIC STOPPING POWERS OF ALUMINUM AND SILICON
Scattering calculations
Extraction of nuclear stopping
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS OF ANTIPROTON TRANSMISSION IN SILICON
Comparison of proton and antiproton penetration depths
Scattering in very thin foils
Antiproton transmission through degrading foils
Lateral range and emission-angle distributions
Channeling effects
Comparison with binary collision approximation
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call