Abstract
Electron microprobe analysis (EMA) and nuclear microanalysis (NMA) have been used to determine light elements ( Z ⩽ 30) in minerals and glasses. Optimum NMA reaction conditions for the detection of various elements are presented and detection limits are estimated for both micro- and macrobeams. A comparison is made between results of EMA and NMA analyses for several elements. Peculiarities of both methods are emphasized. While EMA is convenient in fast routine measurement for most elements in the periodic table above Na, with analytical sensitivities ranging from 100 to 1000 wt. ppm, NMA in charged-particle or prompt gamma-ray nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) mode allows the analysis of all the isotopes between 1H and 19F (except 4He and 20Ne), with a sensitivity often better than 50 ppm. In addition, proton-induced gamma-ray emission (PIGE) enables the determination of heavier elements (from Na to Zn) with relatively good performances. Furthermore, depth profiling and local isotopic ratio measurements constitute some new interesting applications for NMA.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
