Abstract

BackgroundSeptic shock is the most severe phase of sepsis and is associated with high rates of mortality. However, early stage prediction of septic shock outcomes remains difficult. Metabolomic techniques have emerged as a promising tool for improving prognosis.MethodsOrthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) models separating the serum metabolomes of survivors from those of non-survivors were established with samples obtained at the intensive care unit (ICU) admission (H0) and 24 h later (H24). For 51 patients with available H0 and H24 samples, multi-level modeling was performed to provide insight into different metabolic evolutions that occurred between H0 and H24 in the surviving and non-surviving patients. Relative quantification and receiver operational characteristic curves (ROC) were applied to estimate the predictability of key discriminatory metabolites for septic shock mortality.ResultsMetabolites that were involved in energy supply and protein breakdown were primarily responsible for differentiating survivors from non-survivors. This was not only seen in the H0 and H24 discriminatory models, but also in the H0-H24 paired models. Reanalysis of extra H0-H24 paired samples in the established multi-level model demonstrated good performance of the model for the classification of samplings. According to the ROC results, nine discriminatory metabolites defined consistently from the unpaired model and the H0-H24 time-trend change (ΔH24-H0) show good prediction of mortality. These results suggest that NMR-based metabolomic analysis is useful for a better overall assessment of septic shock patients.ConclusionsDysregulation of the metabolites identified by this study is associated with poor outcomes for septic shock. Evaluation of these compounds during the first 24 h after ICU admission in the septic shock patient may be helpful for estimating the severity of cases and for predicting outcomes.Trial registrationAll human serum samples were collected and stored, provided by the “center of biologic resources for liver disease”, in Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France (BB-0033-00027).

Highlights

  • Septic shock is the most severe phase of sepsis and is associated with high rates of mortality

  • New Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPSII) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), SAPSII was able to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors

  • Discriminatory analyses separating septic survivors from non-survivors with samples drawn before treatment (H0) For the H0 samples, a total of 69 samples were analyzed using an Orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) model (PCA models separating the survivors from the non-survivors prior to the exclusion of the outlier have been illustrated in Additional file 1: Figure S3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Septic shock is the most severe phase of sepsis and is associated with high rates of mortality. Early stage prediction of septic shock outcomes remains difficult. Septic shock is the most severe phase of sepsis [1, 2]. It is defined as sepsis complicated either by hypotension that is refractory to fluid resuscitation or by hyperlactacidemia and is often accompanied by acute organ failure. Early personalized prognosis and diagnosis remain challenging due to the complicated etiology and pathogenesis of septic shock. Determination of an acute prognosis in the early stage of sepsis is of great importance to improve therapeutic efficacy and will aid in the development of adapted strategies for different cases. New methods for reliable early prognosis are still urgently needed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.