Nuclear Diversion Theory and Legitimacy Crisis: The Case of Iran

Abstract

Can an insecure regime use nuclear diversion to address its eroding domestic legitimacy? This article argues that facing a domestic legitimacy crisis, a regime might opt to “rally round the nuclear flag” to survive. Theoretically, I argue that, compared with conventional diversion, nuclear diversion is less susceptible to structural restraints, has a unique symbolic value that could aid in coping with an acute legitimacy crisis, and spans a host of diversionary strategies as it ascends the escalation ladder, both before and after acquiring the bomb. The theory is examined empirically via Iranian nuclear policy. I argue that facing a deepening legitimacy crisis, the Iranian regime, throughout Ahmadinejad's tenure, has been increasingly drawing on nuclear diversion to boost public support and that, if the legitimacy crisis lingers, the regime may opt to further employ diversionary nuclear strategies, most of which require a viable “nuclear latency,” rather than actual military nuclear capability.Related Articles Ripberger, Joseph T., Thomas M. Rabovsky, and Kerry G. Herron. 2011. “.” Politics & Policy 39 (): 891‐923. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2011.00327.x/abstract Kane, John, and Haig Patapan. 2010. “.” Politics & Policy 38 (): 589‐610. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2010.00250.x/abstract Darvich, Djamchid, and W. R. Campbell. 1982. “.” Southeastern Political Review 10 (): 37‐87. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.1982.tb00034.x/abstract Related Media Kurzman, Charles. 2009. “.” . July 18. http://chronicle.com/article/Social‐Science‐on‐Trial‐in‐/48949/ . 2011. “.” . February 24. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world‐africa‐12570279