Abstract
It is a great pleasure to present this special number entitled Nuances in the Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea to our Koers readers, the Reformational scholarly community and special science practitioners. This issue is organised around a perceptive article of the same title in which Marinus Dirk Stafleu comments on Danie Strauss's Philosophy: Discipline of the disciplines (see Cameron 2009; Griffioen 2013; Strauss 2009). The latter's stimulating book, published in 2009, further develops and critically updates Herman Dooyeweerd's Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea (PCI). Stafleu's article highlights some differences between his own, Strauss's and Dooyeweerd's interpretation of the PCI and points to the importance of artefacts and technology in his own exploration of the reformational project.
Highlights
It is a great pleasure to present this special number entitled Nuances in the Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea to our Koers readers, the Reformational scholarly community and special science practitioners. This issue is organised around a perceptive article of the same title in which Marinus Dirk Stafleu comments on Danie Strauss’s Philosophy: Discipline of the disciplines
Basden considers information and communication technology as a kind of artefact directed at the lingual, a human aspect
In the fourth and last article of this issue, Systematic considerations within the philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea, Danie Strauss shows how many of the apparent differences between himself and Stafleu can be understood to be terminological differences
Summary
How to cite this article: Hoogstad, H., 2014, ‘Nuances in the Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea’, Koers – Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 79(3), Art. It is a great pleasure to present this special number entitled Nuances in the Philosophy of the Cosmonomic Idea to our Koers readers, the Reformational scholarly community and special science practitioners. This issue is organised around a perceptive article of the same title in which Marinus Dirk Stafleu comments on Danie Strauss’s Philosophy: Discipline of the disciplines (see Cameron 2009; Griffioen 2013; Strauss 2009).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
