Abstract
Soon after the implementation of folic acid fortification in cereal grain products in 1998, several reports appeared in the medical literature showing a reduction in the prevalence of neural tube defects (NTDs). However, a number of investigators observed an ongoing background trend for decreased prevalence of NTDs that began before the implementation of fortification. It is therefore possible that the apparent reduction produced by folic acid fortification actually results from continuation of that trend. Previous studies obtained prevalence ratios consistent with a beneficial effect of fortification through use of a summary of prevalence before and after fortification. Their data, however, do not include an analysis of the magnitude and direction of the change in prevalence over time. This population-based study was designed to determine whether the trend for decline in the prevalence of NTDs observed before fortification (1989-1996) continued after fortification (1998-2003) in 8 central California counties. The study population included all live births, and stillbirths delivered in 8 central California counties from 1989 to 2003. The authors recorded the total number of NTD cases each year. Over the entire study period (1989-2003), 690 of the 886,985 total deliveries were NTD cases. This corresponds to an average prevalence of 77.8 cases per 100,000 deliveries. The authors compared the slopes of two regression lines, pre and postfortification, to provide an estimate of the annual change in NTD prevalence, and to compare the pre and postfortification changes in NTD prevalences over time. Analysis of the slope data for all NTDs combined showed that before fortification NTD prevalences were decreasing by 7.5 (slope: 27.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 212.4, 22.5) cases per 100,000 deliveries per year. After fortification, NTD prevalences were no longer decreasing. The postfortification slope exceeded the prefortification slope by 12.6 (95% CI: 2.6, 22.6) cases per 100,000 deliveries per year. These findings do not appear to result from low intake of folic acid during the postfortification period or differences in maternal race, ethnicity, or obesity. The authors conclude from these findings that the observed decline in NTD prevalence before fortification did not continue after fortification in selected central California counties. The data provide no evidence that fortification with folic acid reduced the prevalence of NTDs in this selected population.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Neural Tube Defects
Implementation Of Fortification
Prevalence Of Neural Tube Defects
Decline In Prevalence
Folic Acid Fortification
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
The Lancet Global Health
Jul 1, 2022
Genetics in Medicine
Dec 1, 2021
Acta Medica Philippina
Mar 30, 2022
Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
Nov 1, 2003
Acta Paediatrica
Jul 24, 2012
The Journal of Pediatrics
Nov 1, 2020
Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
May 18, 2016
Birth Defects Research
Feb 26, 2022
Pediatrics
Oct 1, 2000
British Journal of Nutrition
Dec 16, 2008
Congenital Anomalies
Sep 1, 2017
Gastroenterology
Jul 1, 2011
Journal of pediatric neurology
Jan 1, 2014
Birth Defects Research
Jan 30, 2017
Birth defects research
Apr 6, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Nov 1, 2023