Abstract
Phrase "significantly equal" isn’t regulated in Law 31 of 2000 about Industrial Design, it’s cause in multiple interpretations related to the meaning of "novelty". The novelty element should refer to TRIPs Agreement, which isn’t the same or not similar to the previous disclosure. This study uses a normative juridical method, with a theoretical approach that is relevant to industrial design protection. This is what underlies research to determine the effectiveness of industrial design rights protection based on the novelty principle, and how to formulate law of industrial design in the future.
 Keywords: Industrial Design Rights, Novelty, Protection by Law
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
