Abstract

Previous research has pointed out that the combination of orthographic and semantic-associative training is a more advantageous strategy for the lexicalization of novel written word-forms than their single orthographic training. However, paradigms used previously involve explicit stimuli categorization (lexical decision), which likely influence word learning. In the present study, we used a more automatic task (silent reading) to determine the advantage of the associative training, by comparing the brain electrical signals elicited in combined (orthographic and semantic) and single (only orthographic) training conditions. In addition, the learning effect (in terms of similar neurophysiological activity between novel and known words) was also tested under a categorization paradigm, enabling determination of the possible influence of the training task in the lexicalization process. Results indicated that novel words repeatedly associated with meaningful cues showed a higher attenuation of N400 responses than those trained in the single orthographic condition, confirming the higher facilitation in the lexico-semantic processing of these stimuli, as a consequence of semantic associations. Moreover, only when the combined training was carried out in the reading task did novel words show similar N400 responses to those elicited by known words, suggesting the achievement of a similar lexical processing to known words. Crucially, when the training is carried out under a demanding task context (lexical decision), known words exhibited positive enhancement within the N400 time window, contributing to maintaining N400 differences with novel trained words and confounding the outcome of the learning. Such deflection—compatible with the modulation of the categorization-related P300 component—suggests that novel word learning could be influenced by the activation of categorization-related processes. Thus, the use of low-demand tasks arises as a more appropriate approach to study novel word learning, enabling the build-up process of mental representations, which probably depends on pure lexical and semantic factors rather than being guided by categorization demands.

Highlights

  • The development of reading fluency, namely the ability to visually recognize words with an adequate level of accuracy and speed, is essential for correct performance in most of our daily-life activities and critical for academic and professional success

  • The interaction training × block, marginal (F(1,24) = 3.48, p = 0.07, ηp2 = 0.12, 1-β = 0.43), suggests that both training conditions changed differently across blocks, with higher N400 reduction exhibited by semantically associated novel word-forms across blocks than those repeated under the non-associative training condition; which in turn increased differences between training conditions, from the first to the last task block

  • We evaluated the impact of these two different training conditions under a more automatic task than that used before for this purpose, in which an explicit stimuli categorization was required

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The development of reading fluency, namely the ability to visually recognize words with an adequate level of accuracy and speed, is essential for correct performance in most of our daily-life activities and critical for academic and professional success. This training is characterized as meaningless and non-associative, in which novel written-word forms are briefly exposed to participants through a short number of visual presentations (ranging from 4 and 10, depending on the study) These studies obtained the reduction of the length effect between short and long novel word-forms (Ellis et al, 2009; Maloney et al, 2009; Kwok and Ellis, 2015; Kwok et al, 2017; Suárez-Coalla et al, 2016) or an interference effect in the categorization of known words (Bowers et al, 2005; Qiao and Forster, 2013). Some authors conclude that orthographic training is not enough to ensure the lexicalization of novel word-forms, with effects denoting the acquisition of interfering-episodic memory traces rather than competing-lexical representations after this training

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call