Abstract

Low-temperature combustion (LTC) is an alternative combustion mode to conventional diesel combustion (CDC) that offers a simultaneous reduction in oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) emissions while retaining higher thermal efficiency. Premixed charge compression ignition (PCCI) is a promising LTC strategy that utilizes the early direct injection of diesel and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to reduce NOx and PM emissions simultaneously. A limited operating load range and high unburned hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions are the significant shortcomings to be addressed to realize PCCI as a commercially viable option. The present work aims to address these limitations based on experimental investigations carried out in a production light-duty diesel engine. An existing mechanical fuel injection system is replaced with a flexible common rail direct injection (CRDI) system to implement PCCI in the test engine. Based on initial parametric investigations, it was found that a combination of early direct injection, lower injection pressures, and EGR was deemed necessary to achieve PCCI mode in the test engine. However, the achievable load range was limited to 40% of the rated load, along with high HC and CO emissions. Novel approaches are attempted to address these limitations, including replacing diesel with diesel-gasoline blends with 30% gasoline by volume and utilizing a dual charge dilution strategy with water vapour induction and EGR. The start of fuel injection (SOI) sweeps from 30 to 70 deg. CA bTDC were performed to find optimal timing at each load condition to maximize the thermal efficiency within a stable combustion regime between a misfire and knocking. For loads above 40%, EGR in the range of 14% to 26.5% was used to bring the combustion within knock limits. By combining the proposed novel strategies, the engine operating load range could be extended from 40% to 80% of the rated load in PCCI. The NOx and soot emissions were significantly reduced up to 98.5% and 99.1%, respectively, compared to CDC. The engine brake thermal efficiency is increased by up to 1.6%. However, there was a significant penalty regarding HC and CO emissions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call