Abstract

ObjectiveConventional, separate mediastinal and pleural tubes are often inefficient at draining thoracic effusions.DescriptionWe developed a Y-shaped chest tube with split ends that divide within the thoracic cavity, permitting separate intrathoracic placement and requiring a single exit port. In this study, thoracic drainage by the split drain vs. that of separate drains was tested.MethodsAfter sternotomy, pericardiotomy, and left pleurotomy, pigs were fitted with separate chest drains (n=10) or a split tube prototype (n=9) with internal openings positioned in the mediastinum and in the costo-diaphragmatic recess. Separate series of experiments were conducted to test drainage of D5W or 0.58 M sucrose, an aqueous solution with viscosity approximating that of plasma. One litre of fluid was infused into the thorax, and suction was applied at −20 cm H2O for 30 min.ResultsWhen D5W was infused, the split drain left a residual volume of 53 ± 99 ml (mean value ± SD) vs. 148 ± 120 for the separate drain (P=0.007), representing a drainage efficiency (i.e. drained vol/[drained + residual vol]) of 95 ± 10% vs. 86 ± 12% for the separate drains (P = 0.011). In the second series, the split drain evacuated more 0.58 M sucrose in the first minute (967 ± 129 ml) than the separate drains (680 ± 192 ml, P<0.001). By 30 min, the split drain evacuated a similar volume of sucrose vs. the conventional drain (1089 ± 72 vs. 1056 ± 78 ml; P = 0.5). Residual volume tended to be lower (25 ± 10 vs. 62 ± 72 ml; P = 0.128) and drainage efficiency tended to be higher (98 ± 1 vs. 95 ± 6%; P = 0.111) with the split drain vs. conventional separate drains.ConclusionThe split chest tube drained the thoracic cavity at least as effectively as conventional separate tubes. This new device could potentially alleviate postoperative complications.

Highlights

  • Lifesaving surgeries on the heart and lungs, including coronary artery bypass grafting, replacement of diseased heart valves, and resection of lung cancers, require opening the chest cavity, incising the pericardial and/or pleural membranes lining the chest wall and thoracic organs, and operating on the heart, lungs and/or major blood vessels. These surgical sites can exude large volumes of fluid, often exceeding 1 litre, which collects in the pleural space and compresses the thoracic organs, compromising cardiac performance and ventilation [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]

  • Chest tubes were inserted into the thoracic cavity

  • Drainage efficiency was 95 ± 10% for the split drain vs. 86 ± 12% for the separate drains (P = 0.011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lifesaving surgeries on the heart and lungs, including coronary artery bypass grafting, replacement of diseased heart valves, and resection of lung cancers, require opening the chest cavity, incising the pericardial and/or pleural membranes lining the chest wall and thoracic organs, and operating on the heart, lungs and/or major blood vessels These surgical sites can exude large volumes of fluid, often exceeding 1 litre, which collects in the pleural space and compresses the thoracic organs, compromising cardiac performance and ventilation [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Improved chest drain device and performance can reduce drain indwelling duration so drains can be removed earlier, allowing hospitalization to be shortened from the current 4-5 days [11,12,13]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.