Novel selective agonists and antagonists confirm neurokinin NK1 receptors in guinea‐pig vas deferens

Abstract

1. This study investigated the recognition characteristics of neurokinin receptors mediating potentiation of the contractile response to field stimulation in the guinea-pig vas deferens. 2. A predominant NK1 receptor population is strongly suggested by the relative activities of the common naturally-occurring tachykinin agonists, which fall within less than one order of magnitude. This conclusion is supported by the relative activities of the synthetic NK1 selective agonists substance P methyl ester, [Glp6,L-Pro9]-SP(6-11) and delta-aminovaleryl-[L-Pro9,N-MeLeu10]- SP(7-11) (GR73632) which were 0.78, 9.3 and 120 as active as substance P, respectively. Furthermore, the NK2 selective agonist [Lys3, Gly8,-R-gamma-lactam-Leu9]-NKA(3-10) (GR64349) was active only at the highest concentrations tested (greater than 10 microM), and the NK3 selective agonist, succ-[Asp6,N-MePhe8]-SP(6-11) (senktide) was essentially inactive (10 nM-32 microM). 3. [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]-SP(1-11) antagonized responses to neurokinin A, neurokinin B, physalaemin, eledoisin, [Glp6,D-Pro9]-SP(6-11), GR73632 and GR64349 (apparent pKB s 5.6-6.2), but was less potent in antagonizing responses to substance P, substance P methyl ester and [Glp6,L-Pro9]-SP(6-11) (apparent pKB s less than or equal to 5.0-5.0). 4. In contrast, the recently developed NK1-selective receptor antagonist [D-Pro9[Spiro-gamma-lactam]Leu10,Trp11]-SP(1-11) (GR71251) did not produce agonist-dependent pKB estimates. Schild plot analysis indicated a competitive interaction with a single receptor population where the antagonist had an estimated overall pKB of 7.58 +/- 0.13 for the four agonists of differing subtype selectivity tested (GR73632, GR64349, substance P methyl ester and neurokinin B). This estimate is similar to that we obtained for NK1-mediated (substance P methyl ester) contraction in the guinea-pig ileum preparation (pKB= 7.86+ 0.05). 5. Tachykinin action appears not to depend on release of a number of intermediary mediators including acetylcholine, histamine or cyclo-oxygenase products, nor to involve interaction with neuronal mechanisms including alpha 2-adrenoceptor feedback, noradrenergic Uptake-I or opioid-release, since antagonism or inhibition of these mechanisms did not modify responses to tachykinins. 6. We conclude that tachykinin action in the field-stimulated guinea-pig vas deferens preparation is mediated through interaction with a predominant neurokinin NK, receptor population and this preparation can therefore be used to study NK, modulation of sympathetic neurotransmission.