Abstract

Abstract Background The optimal method for balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) deployment remains unknown. Current implantation protocols are volume-dependent and rely on ad-hoc filling of the deployment apparatus without accounting for annular wall tension during prosthesis expansion, predisposing patients to inconsistent clinical outcomes. During THV deployment, the annular wall tension exerted by the expanding prosthesis is determined by prosthesis diameter and balloon pressure (Laplace's Law). Objective We proposed and tested a novel method for balloon-expandable THV deployment, aimed at controlling balloon pressure and the resulting annular wall tension to allow optimal prosthesis-annulus apposition while preventing significant tissue injury. Methods 330 consecutive patients with severe native aortic stenosis who underwent balloon-expandable THV implantation between 2015–2020 were included. 106 patients were considered high-risk for annular rupture. THVs were deployed until reaching a pre-determined balloon pressure; 4–4.5atm in earlier cases to establish experience and safety, later increasing to 5–6.5atm in most cases. Post-dilatation was performed to reduce >mild angiographic regurgitation (PVR). Using a biomechanical model, annular wall stress (tension) was estimated for each case and assessed against recorded rates of post-dilatation, ≥mild paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) on TTE, new PPM or LBBB and annular rupture. Results Patients with wall stress >3MPa (n=184) had reduced post-dilatation rate (p<0.001) and final PVR (≥mild, p=0.014). Annular rupture occurred in 2/3 high-risk cases with wall stress >3.5MPa; no rupture occurred in 102 high-risk cases with wall stress ≤3.5MPa. Based on these results, we defined target deployment wall stress levels (3–3.5MPa) and associated deployment pressure per THV size. Patients within this target range (n=136) had 8.1% new PPM, 12.5% new LBBB, 12.7% mild PVR with no cases of ≥moderate PVR. Importantly, there was an inconsistent relationship between deployment balloon volume and resulting annular wall stress. Conclusion Pressure-regulated THV deployment is a simple, easily reproducible, safe and effective method, regardless of high-risk anatomical complexities. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Annular wall stress and PVRModel, stress vs volume and new strategy

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call