Abstract
New oxazolinyl derivatives of [17(20)E]-pregna-5,17(20)-diene: 2′-{[(E)-3β-hydroxyandrost-5-en-17-ylidene]methyl}-4′,5′-dihydro-1′,3′-oxazole 1 and 2′-{[(E)-3β-hydroxyandrost-5-en-17-ylidene]methyl}-4′,4′-dimethyl-4′,5′-dihydro-1′,3′-oxazole 2 were evaluated as potential CYP17A1 inhibitors in comparison with 17-(pyridin-3-yl)androsta-5,16-dien-3β-ol 3 (abiraterone). Differential absorption spectra of human recombinant CYP17A1 in the presence of compound 1 (λmax=422nm, λmin=386nm) and compound 2 (λmax=416nm) indicated significant differences in enzyme/inhibitors complexes. CYP17A1 activity was measured using electrochemical methods. Inhibitory activity of compound 1 was comparable with abiraterone 3 (IC50=0.9±0.1μM, and IC50=1.3±0.1μM, for compounds 1 and 3, respectively), while compound 2 was found to be weaker inhibitor (IC50=13±1μM). Docking of aforementioned compounds to CYP17A1 revealed that steroid fragments of compound 1 and abiraterone 3 occupied close positions; oxazoline cycle of compound 1 was coordinated with heme iron similarly to pyridine cycle of abiraterone 3. Configuration of substituents at 17(20) double bond in preferred docked position corresponded to Z-isomers of compounds 1 and 2. Presence of 4′-substituents in oxazoline ring of compound 2 prevents coordination of oxazoline nitrogen with heme iron and worsens its docking score in comparison with compound 1. These data indicate that oxazolinyl derivative of [17(20)E]-pregna-5,17(20)-diene 1 (rather than 4′,4′-dimethyl derivative 2) may be considered as potential CYP17A1 inhibitor and template for development of new compounds affecting growth and proliferation of prostate cancer cells.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have