Abstract

Lithium and sodium-ion batteries have become the focal point of interest for the energy transition due to their promising applications for electric cars and energy grid storage. Operando characterization of batteries is critical to understand the degradation processes and increasing their electrochemical performance, especially in abusive conditions like during fast charges. Knowledge of the redox state of each electrode is essential to identify the origins of capacity loss in full batteries. Among the methods used for these investigations, operando Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) methods are promising since, without destroying the battery, they enable monitoring in real-time the electrochemical processes and the formation of short-lived metastable or reactive phases [1,2].Up to now, most operando NMR studies have focused on 7Li NMR spectroscopy to follow the lithiation and degradation processes in the solid electrodes of lithium-ion batteries. However, the large shifts and broadenings of the NMR spectra, which result from the redox-active paramagnetic ions (Ni2/3+, Co4+, Mn3/4+) or from the metallicity of the electrodes [3], complicate operando NMR spectra acquisition and interpretation for full batteries.Herein, we demonstrate that the 1H operando NMR signal of the liquid electrolyte solvent can be used to spy on the positive electrode evolution while benefitting from the high sensitivity of 1H liquid-state NMR compared to 7Li NMR. So far, operando NMR using the liquid electrolyte signal was mainly exploited to follow electrolyte decomposition [4] or to image indirectly dendrite formation [5]. Contrary to the lithium or sodium atoms composing the electrodes, hydrogen atoms in the electrolyte solvent are not a direct probe of the state of charge of the electrode. We demonstrate that the 1H NMR signal of the electrolyte molecules in the battery is, however, highly sensitive to the magnetic susceptibility (and therefore the redox state) of the neighboring particles of positive electrode active material.The state-of-charge (SOC) of the positive electrodes in the charging battery can be tracked indirectly through distortion in the spectrum of the dimethyl carbonate (DMC) solvent near the positive electrode. The effect of the other battery components such as current collectors, separators, or even negative electrodes is shown to be negligible compared to the perturbations induced by the positive electrode. We define specific descriptors to track the changes in the distorted 1H NMR spectrum of the battery and we correlate these changes with the state-of-charge of the positive electrode inside the battery as it is charged and discharged. This approach will enable measuring, operando, the redox state of positive electrodes in batteries, even when their 7Li signals cannot be detected by NMR. Exact knowledge of the redox state will contribute to a better exploitation of the electrochemical curves in full batteries.[1] Bagheri, K.; Deschamps, M.; Salager, E. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for Interfaces in Rechargeable Batteries. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 2023, 64, 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2022.101675.[2] Liu, X.; Liang, Z.; Xiang, Y.; Lin, M.; Li, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, G.; Fu, R.; Yang, Y. Solid‐State NMR and MRI Spectroscopy for Li/Na Batteries: Materials, Interface, and in Situ Characterization. Advanced Materials 2021, 33 (50), 2005878. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202005878.[3] Grey, C. P.; Dupré, N. NMR Studies of Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Rechargeable Batteries. Chemical Reviews 2004, 104 (10), 4493–4512. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020734p.[4] Wiemers-Meyer, S.; Winter, M.; Nowak, S. NMR as a Powerful Tool to Study Lithium Ion Battery Electrolytes. Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy 2019, 121–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.arnmr.2018.12.003.[5] Ilott, A. J.; Mohammadi, M.; Chang, H. J.; Grey, C. P.; Jerschow, A. Real-Time 3D Imaging of Microstructure Growth in Battery Cells Using Indirect MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016, 113 (39), 10779–10784. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607903113.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call