Abstract

BackgroundAlthough the terms “agonist” and “antagonist” have been used to classify sigma-1 receptor (σ1R) ligands, an unambiguous definition of the functional activity is often hard. In order to determine the pharmacological profile of σ1R ligands, the most common method is to assess their potency to alleviate opioid analgesia. It has been well established that σ1R agonists reduce opioid analgesic activity, while σ1R antagonists have been demonstrated to enhance opioid analgesia in different pain models.MethodsIn the present study, we evaluated the pharmacological profile of selected σ1R ligands using a novel object recognition (NOR) test, to see if any differences in cognitive functions between σ1R agonists and antagonists could be observed. We used the highly selective PRE-084 and S1RA as reference σ1R agonist and antagonist, respectively. Furthermore, compound KSK100 selected from our ligand library was also included in this study. KSK100 was previously characterized as a dual-targeting histamine H3/σ1R antagonist with antinociceptive and antiallodynic activity in vivo. Donepezil (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and σ1R agonist) was used as a positive control drug.ResultsBoth tested σ1R agonists (donepezil and PRE-084) improved learning in the NOR test, which was not observed with the σ1R antagonists S1RA and KSK100.ConclusionsThe nonlinear dose–response effect of PRE-084 in this assay does not justify its use for routine assessment of the functional activity of σ1R ligands.Graphical

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call