Novel insights on outcome in horizontal aorta with self-expandable new-generation transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices.

Abstract

The impact of a horizontal aorta (HA) on adverse events (AE) following in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is dealt controversially. Using new-generation self-expandable devices, we aimed to reevaluate an appropriate threshold of the aortic root angulation (ARA) in terms of HA and its impact on outcome. The 466 consecutive patients, who underwent transfemoral TAVR with self-expandable new-generation devices, were analyzed. Patients were classified into cases with HA (ARA ≥ 51°; n = 225; 48%) and without HA (ARA <51°; n = 241; 52%). Primary endpoints were device success and 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were specific AE according to VARC-2 definitions. Contrast use (107.6 ± 50.1 vs. 94.1 ± 46.1 ml; p = .033) and radiation dose (3,176 [1,928-5,596] vs. 2,651 [1,643-4,394] Gyxcm2 ; p = .016) were higher in HA. Primary device success was comparable (97.1 vs. 97.8%; p = .773). A 30-day mortality (3.3 vs. 0.4%; p = .038, plogrank = 0.025), stroke (7.1 vs. 2.7%; p = .033), and major vascular complications (MVASC) (6.6 vs. 2.7%; p = .050) were more frequent in HA. Pronounced calcification of the noncoronary cusp and left ventricular outflow tract, the condition of HA, as well as repositioning maneuvers were independent predictors for overall specific AE. An HA above 51° is associated with an increased rate of stroke, MVASC, and 30-day mortality. Valve size and asymmetric calcification affect the incidence of repositioning maneuvers and subsequent VARC-2 AE, indicating that an HA-together with specific anatomic features-remains a crucial factor for TAVR-related outcome with self-expandable new-generation devices.