Novel insights into intestinal and renal folate transport. Focus on “Apical membrane targeting and trafficking of the human proton-coupled folate transporter in polarized epithelia”

Abstract

FOLATE IS AN ESSENTIAL MICRONUTRIENT that functions as a coenzyme in DNA and RNA synthesis and in the metabolism of several amino acids, including homocysteine (11). Folate deficiency can occur in humans because of poor dietary intake, malabsorption, metabolic blocks, or increased requirements as seen during pregnancy and lactation (3). Symptoms of deficiency are severe and include megoblastic anemia and neural tube defects in children. Mammals must absorb folate from the diet, because they do not have the capability to synthesize folate. Intestinal absorption occurs by both passive and carriermediated mechanisms, with the second process predominating in the proximal small intestine at normal intake levels (3). Intestinal transport is critical for overall body folate homeostasis, as exemplified by the fact that individuals with hereditary folate malabsorption exhibit signs of folate deficiency (5, 6). Dietary folate exists in the polyglutamate form, which is converted to the monoglutamate form before absorption. Transport across the intestinal epithelium is a two-step process; the putative brush-border membrane transporter is pH dependent (i.e., higher activity at low pH) (12), and movement across the basolateral surface is also a carrier-mediated process that has been previously described (13). Recently, three folate transport systems have been identified in mammals: the reduced folate carrier (RFC) (4, 8), the folate receptor (FR) (7), and the newly described proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT; also called SLC46A1) (9). The relative role of each of these transport systems in intestinal and renal folate absorption is currently not completely understood (although the FR, which was described in renal cells, has not been identified in the intestine). The recent studies by Subramanian et al. (17) have provided novel evidence that makes a major contribution to our understanding of folate homeostasis. These authors have clearly demonstrated, for the first time, that the human PCFT is a brush-border membrane protein in polarized epithelia; they show that it is functionally expressed on the apical membrane in widely accepted models of the intestinal and renal epithelia. Moreover, in polarized MDCK cells, they noted that the PCFT and the RFC showed differential localization, with the RFC present on the basolateral domain and the PCFT in the apical membrane. Additional experiments were aimed at determining the trafficking motifs of the PCFT and the effect of clinically relevant mutations; results showed that the COOH terminus was not important for apical targeting and that mutation of a region (DXXGR[113]R) associated with hereditary folate malabsorption (the R[113]S mutation has been identified in a human patient) (20) abolished a -turn between membrane-spanning domains 2 and 3 and led to protein retention in the endoplasmic reticulum. Further analyses found that cell surface delivery of the PCFT is dependent on an intact microtubular network. The findings presented in this article reveal new aspects of folate transport that can only be appreciated in the context of previous studies in this field. Prior investigations suggested that the RFC is important in intestinal and renal folate absorption. Some studies found RFC expressed on the intestinal brush-border membrane in mouse (18) and rat (1) intestine, where it is presumably involved in folate absorption, while others described expression at the basolateral surface of renal epithelial cells (2) and at the plasma membrane when expressed in Xenopus oocytes (16). Moreover, the RFC was found to be ontogenically regulated during rat development and was reflective of overall intestinal folate transport (1). Despite these intriguing observations, certain inconsistencies exist between the known properties of intestinal folate transport and those ascribed to the RFC, including the higher activity of the RFC at neutral as opposed to acidic pH (15).