Abstract

Abstract. Atmospheric aerosol microphysical processes are a significant source of uncertainty in predicting climate change. Specifically, aerosol nucleation, emissions, and growth rates, which are simulated in chemical transport models to predict the particle size distribution, are not understood well. However, long-term size distribution measurements made at several ground-based sites across Europe implicitly contain information about the processes that created those size distributions. This work aims to extract that information by developing and applying an inverse technique to constrain aerosol emissions as well as nucleation and growth rates based on hourly size distribution measurements. We developed an inverse method based upon process control theory into an online estimation technique to scale aerosol nucleation, emissions, and growth so that the model–measurement bias in three measured aerosol properties exponentially decays. The properties, which are calculated from the measured and predicted size distributions, used to constrain aerosol nucleation, emission, and growth rates are the number of particles with a diameter between 3 and 6 nm, the number with a diameter greater than 10 nm, and the total dry volume of aerosol (N3–6, N10, Vdry), respectively. In this paper, we focus on developing and applying the estimation methodology in a zero-dimensional “box” model as a proof of concept before applying it to a three-dimensional simulation in subsequent work. The methodology is first tested on a dataset of synthetic and perfect measurements that span diverse environments in which the true particle emissions, growth, and nucleation rates are known. The inverse technique accurately estimates the aerosol microphysical process rates with an average and maximum error of 2 % and 13 %, respectively. Next, we investigate the effect that measurement noise has on the estimated rates. The method is robust to typical instrument noise in the aerosol properties as there is a negligible increase in the bias of the estimated process rates. Finally, the methodology is applied to long-term datasets of in situ size distribution measurements in western Europe from May 2006 through June 2007. At Melpitz, Germany, and Hyytiälä, Finland, the average diurnal profiles of estimated 3 nm particle formation rates are reasonable, having peaks near noon local time with average peak values of 1 and 0.15 cm−3 s−1, respectively. The normalized absolute error in estimated N3–6, N10, and Vdry at three European measurement sites is less than 15 %, showing that the estimation framework developed here has potential to decrease model–measurement bias while constraining uncertain aerosol microphysical processes.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric aerosols scatter and absorb incoming solar radiation (Cubasch et al, 2013)

  • Since we previously found that an ill-conditioned sensitivity matrix results in inaccurately estimated process rates when using synthetic measurements, we avoid solving an ill-conditioned system by reducing the system of equations

  • This work has explored a way to assimilate particle size distribution data with an aerosol microphysics algorithm used in 3D chemical transport models (CTMs) by designing a novel estimation algorithm borrowed from the field of nonlinear process control

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric aerosols scatter and absorb incoming solar radiation (Cubasch et al, 2013). Previous work focuses on extracting particle formation and growth rates from size distributions observed at a measurement site (Kerminen et al, 2018) These studies utilize methods developed by Kulmala et al (2012, and references therein) to determine aerosol process rates during new particle formation (NPF) events. Previous studies used size distribution measurements from smog chamber experiments with 0D (“box”) models simulating the aerosol general dynamic equation (GDE) to estimate uncertain terms in the GDE (Pierce et al, 2008; Verheggen and Mozurkewich, 2006) These inverse models estimate processes such as nucleation, growth, and chamber wall loss by minimizing the model–measurement bias. While the ultimate goal of this work is to deploy the inverse method in a 3D CTM, all of the steps presented here are proof-ofconcept work in a zero-dimensional atmospheric box model

Inverse modeling methods
TOMAS model
Parameter estimation technique
Particle size distribution observations
Validation of inverse modeling technique
Estimation of ambient aerosol dynamics
Simulating ambient aerosol with TOMAS
Estimation results
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.