Abstract

IntroductionOsteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fractures. Studies have demonstrated the use of phytoestrogens, or plant-derived estrogens, such as genistein and daidzein, to effectively increase osteogenic activity of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Herein, the effects of daidzein analogs on the osteogenic differentiation efficiency of human BMSC and adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASC) were explored.MethodsBMSCs and ASCs underwent osteogenic differentiation in the presence of vehicle, 17β-estradiol (E2), phytoestrogens, or daidzein analogs. Cells were stained for alkaline phosphatase (ALP) enzymatic activity, calcium deposition by alizarin red s, and phosphate mineralization by silver nitrate. Gene expression analysis was conducted on cells treated with daidzein analogs.ResultsCells treated with E2, daidzein, or genistein increased calcium deposition by 1.6-, 1.5-, and 1.4-fold, respectively, relative to vehicle-treated BMSCs and 1.6-, 1.7-, and 1.4-fold relative to vehicle-treated ASCs, respectively. BMSCs treated with daidzein analog 2c, 2g, and 2l demonstrated a 1.6-, 1.6-, and 1.9-fold increase in calcium deposition relative to vehicle-treated BMSCs, respectively, while ASCs treated with daidzein analog 2c, 2g, or 2l demonstrated a 1.7-, 2.0-, and 2.2-fold increase in calcium deposition relative to vehicle-treated ASCs, respectively. Additional analysis with BMSCs and ASCs was conducted in the more efficient compounds: 2g and 2l. ALP activity and phosphate mineralization was increased in 2g- and 2l-treated cells. The analysis of lineage specific gene expression demonstrated increased expression of key osteogenic genes (RUNX2, c-FOS, SPARC, DLX5, SPP1, COL1A1, IGF1, SOST, and DMP1) and earlier induction of these lineage specific genes, following treatment with 2g or 2l, relative to vehicle-treated cells. Estrogen receptor (ER) inhibitor studies demonstrated that ER antagonist fulvestrant inhibited the osteogenic differentiation of 2g in BMSCs and ASCs, while fulvestrant only attenuated the effects of 2l, suggesting that 2l acts by both ER dependent and independent pathways.ConclusionsThese studies provide support for exploring the therapeutic efficacy of daidzein derivatives for the treatment of osteoporosis. Furthermore, the patterns of gene induction differed following treatment with each daidzein analog, suggesting that these daidzein analogs activate distinct ER and non-ER pathways to induce differentiation in BMSCs and ASCs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/scrt493) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fractures

  • bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC) and adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASC) demonstrate similar stem cell characteristics BMSCs and ASCs were stained for cell surface antigens, plated for colony-forming units, and induced to differentiate down osteogenic and adipogenic lineages

  • It should be noted that while E2, daidzein, and genistein all enhanced osteogenic differentiation on average, two of the six BMSC donors and three of the six ASC donors did not respond to genistein treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of fractures. Anti-resorptive drugs reduce the breakdown of bone during normal remodeling and reduce bone loss by limiting osteoclast activity [7]. These drugs include bisphosphonate, calcitonin, and denosumab. Studies have shown that delivery of these drugs independently or in combination is effective in reducing bone loss. While these drugs limit the severity of osteoporosis, it is still necessary for bone to undergo regeneration to restore the architecture of the bone and provide strength to the bones. Anabolic drugs have been shown to achieve higher BMD, and to improve the quality and the strength of the bone [8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call