Abstract

To characterize the frequency of adverse events (AEs) associated with peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) and to identify baseline characteristics that predict higher risk of AEs.This retrospective cohort analysis included 104 pediatric subjects enrolled in 3 peanut OIT trials. All participants had a positive peanut skin test (SPT); the majority had an elevated peanut-specific IgE level and other allergic diseases.Safety data were collected from symptom records during dose escalation at the research unit, symptom diaries of home AEs, and parental report of home AEs. All events considered likely related to OIT by study investigators at the time of occurrence were studied. Statistical models were used to identify baseline predictors of AEs.Eighty percent of subjects experienced at least 1 AE. Eighty-five percent of AEs were mild, and 15% were moderate. Ten percent of AEs were classified as systemic. The AE rate was higher in the buildup phase than the maintenance phase. More than 90% of AEs occurred at home. AEs involved the skin, respiratory system, and GI tract. Almost half of the subjects experienced GI symptoms. Nearly 13% withdrew from OIT because of AEs, most commonly because of new-onset GI symptoms. Adjusting for confounding variables, allergic rhinitis (AR) and peanut SPT size were significant predictors of the overall rate of AEs. AR was the only predictor of systemic AEs and was associated with the seasonality of AEs. Peanut SPT size was the only predictor of GI AEs. Asthma was associated with increased AEs during the maintenance phase only. Sixty-one percent of subjects received treatment with antihistamines, steroids, albuterol, or epinephrine; 12% received epinephrine. Eighty-five percent of systemic AEs were not treated with epinephrine.Peanut OIT is associated with frequent, though usually mild, AEs. Persistent GI symptoms are the most common cause of OIT dropout. AR and peanut SPT size are significant predictors of systemic and GI AEs, respectively. Knowledge gaps surrounding epinephrine use exist, even in highly motivated research populations.This is the largest safety analysis to date of peanut OIT in a controlled research setting. The study confirms a high rate of typically mild AEs and identifies peanut SPT size as a useful predictor of GI AEs, which are confirmed as the most common reason for dropout. The novel finding of AR as a risk factor for AEs will inform future investigation. While OIT is a promising therapy, this study highlights the need for further examination of its risk-to-benefit ratio before widespread clinical use.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call