Abstract

Spinal control at intervertebral levels is dependent on interactions between the active, passive and neural control elements. However, this has never been quantifiable, and has therefore been outside the reach of clinical assessments and research. This study used fluoroscopy during repeated unconstrained flexion and return neck movements to calculate intersegmental motor control (MC), defined as the difference and variation in repeated continuous angular motion from its average path. The study aimed to determine control values for MC at individual levels and its variability. Twenty male volunteers aged 19–29 received fluoroscopic screening of their cervical spines during 4 repetitions of neutral to full flexion and return motion. Moving vertebral images from C0–C1 to C6–C7 were tracked using cross-correlation codes written in Matlab. MC for each level was defined as the mean of the absolute differences between each repetition’s angular path and their mean and its variability as represented by the SD. 1-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons were used to identify significant contrasts between levels. The mean MC differences and SDs were highest at C1-2, suggesting that this level has the least control and the most variability. Results at this level alone were highly significant (F-ratio 10.88 and 9.79 P < 0.0001). Significant contrasts were only found between C1-C2 and all other levels. The mean MC difference for summed C1-6 levels was 3.4° (0.7–6.1). This study is the first to quantify intervertebral MC in the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Studies of neck pain patients are now merited.

Highlights

  • Spinal control at intervertebral levels is dependent on interactions between the active, passive and neural control elements

  • Whilst ranges of the motion (RoM) may be considered a representation of stiffness, its wide variation in asymptomatic populations reduces its value in clinical assessments

  • What is causing the results/differences between levels? That C1-2 may be biomechanically distinct from the other cervical segments in terms of its motor control capacity is not unexpected and is likely to reflect changes in afferent input and its unique muscular morphology as well as the absence of an intervertebral disc at that level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spinal control at intervertebral levels is dependent on interactions between the active, passive and neural control elements. These include; tracking a­ ccuracy[7, 8], smoothness of m­ otion[9], irregularity of m­ ovements[10, 11] and ­stiffness[12,13,14] All these studies investigated MC at a global level (i.e. movements of the entire cervical spine), and did not reveal anything about inter-segmental control mechanisms. Changes in global motion have been observed between patients and c­ ontrols[21, 22], these changes have not been shown to be significantly different at the inter-vertebral level, including after treatment ­interventions[23] This limits their value in terms of understanding painrelated adaptations in MC

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call