Abstract

An accurate assessment of pollutants’ exposure and precise evaluation of the clinical outcomes pose two major challenges to the contemporary environmental health research. The common methods for exposure assessment are based on residential addresses and are prone to many biases. Pollution levels are defined based on monitoring stations that are sparsely distributed and frequently distanced far from residential addresses. In addition, the degree of an association between outdoor and indoor air pollution levels is not fully elucidated, making the exposure assessment all the more inaccurate. Clinical outcomes’ assessment, on the other hand, mostly relies on the access to medical records from hospital admissions and outpatients’ visits in clinics. This method differentiates by health care seeking behavior and is therefore, problematic in evaluation of an onset, duration, and severity of an outcome. In the current paper, we review a number of novel solutions aimed to mitigate the aforementioned biases. First, a hybrid satellite-based modeling approach provides daily continuous spatiotemporal estimations with improved spatial resolution of 1 × 1 km2 and 200 × 200 m2 grid, and thus allows a more accurate exposure assessment. Utilizing low-cost air pollution sensors allowing a direct measurement of indoor air pollution levels can further validate these models. Furthermore, the real temporal-spatial activity can be assessed by GPS tracking devices within the individuals’ smartphones. A widespread use of smart devices can help with obtaining objective measurements of some of the clinical outcomes such as vital signs and glucose levels. Finally, human biomonitoring can be efficiently done at a population level, providing accurate estimates of in-vivo absorbed pollutants and allowing for the evaluation of body responses, by biomarkers examination. We suggest that the adoption of these novel methods will change the research paradigm heavily relying on ecological methodology and support development of the new clinical practices preventing adverse environmental effects on human health.

Highlights

  • There is number of ways in which an air pollution may affect the biosphere, and human health in particular

  • [4,5], as most ofcommon the models dismiss estimates of the exposure burden (Figure 1): (1) Low spatiotemporal resolution relying on sparse between the indoor/outdoor pollution and essentially use the outdoor air pollution as a proxy for monitoring stations might lead to misclassification bias for patients residing distantly from the overall exposure static spatio-temporal approach to the exposure assessment monitoring sites [2,3]; (2) lack of the assessment of the indoor air quality [4,5], as most of the models based mostly dismiss the difference between the indoor/outdoor pollution andindividuals’

  • We have been forced to sacrifice one goal to achieve another; the researchers could assess large populations using an ecological design with imprecise exposure assessment of conduct personal exposure studies on a small scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is number of ways in which an air pollution may affect the biosphere, and human health in particular. Research1): programs investigating the association between air pollutionon and human monitoring health exposure burden (Figure (1) Low spatiotemporal resolution relying sparse stations normally encounter two major challenges of exposure assessment and health outcomes evaluation. The following are the barriers for accurate the difference (2) lack of the assessment the indoor air quality [4,5], as most ofcommon the models dismiss estimates of the exposure burden (Figure 1): (1) Low spatiotemporal resolution relying on sparse between the indoor/outdoor pollution and essentially use the outdoor air pollution as a proxy for monitoring stations might lead to misclassification bias for patients residing distantly from the overall exposure [6,7];. Indicators that can reveal a plausible biological mechanism is limited due to a small sample size prospective studies plagued by high costs [27,28,29,30,31]

Exposure Assessment
Remote Sensing
Low Cost Air Pollution Sensors
Real Time Location Activity and the Use of Smart Devices
Assessment of Clinical Outcomes
Utilization of Smart Devices
Human Biomonitoring
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call