Abstract
BackgroundWe describe a technical modification to approach for dissection of proximal pouch in patients undergoing the primary repair of congenital Esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF). MethodsA prospective comparative study was performed from January 2016 to December, 2019 including the patients who were undergoing primary repair of EA-TEF (Type C). The patients were divided into Group A (upper pouch dissection by classical approach) and Group B (technical modification). The two groups were compared for operative outcome and complications. Modified OSATS score was used to rate the performance of operators in two groups and were compared. ResultsTotal of 70 patients were included. In Group B, the mean operating time was less compared to Group A. The incidence of tracheal injury was also less when compared to previous data (p = 0.042). Mean OSATS score for flow of operation and overall performance was better in Group B (p = 0.002, p = 0.005). The OSATS score was also better for fifth and seventh case in Group B, proving its faster learning by trainee fellows. ConclusionThe technical modification decreases chances of tracheal injury and shortens the learning curve for upper pouch dissection. Level of evidenceLevel III.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.