Abstract

Water alternating gas (WAG) injection process is a proven EOR technology that has been successfully deployed in many fields around the globe. The performance of WAG process is measured by its incremental recovery factor over secondary recovery. The application of this technology remains limited due to the complexity of the WAG injection process which requires time-consuming in-depth technical studies. This research was performed for a purpose of developing a predictive model for WAG incremental recovery factor based on integrated approach that involves reservoir simulation and data mining. A thousand reservoir simulation models were developed to evaluate WAG injection performance over waterflooding. Reservoir model parameters assessed in this research study were horizontal and vertical permeabilities, fluids properties, WAG injection scheme, fluids mobility, trapped gas saturation, reservoir pressure, residual oil saturation to gas, and injected gas volume. The outcome of the WAG simulation models was fed to the two selected data mining techniques, regression and group method of data handling (GMDH), to build WAG incremental recovery factor predictive model. Input data to the machine learning technique were split into two sets: 70% for training the model and 30% for model validation. Predictive models that calculate WAG incremental recovery factor as a function of the input parameters were developed. The predictive models correlation coefficient of 0.766 and 0.853 and root mean square error of 3.571 and 2.893 were achieved from regression and GMDH methods, respectively. GMDH technique demonstrated its strength and ability in selecting effective predictors, optimizing network structure, and achieving more accurate predictive model. The achieved WAG incremental recovery factor predictive models are expected to help reservoir engineers perform quick evaluation of WAG performance and assess a WAG project risk prior launching detailed time-consuming and costly technical studies.

Highlights

  • With the decline in the production rate of petroleum reservoirs and increase in energy demand, E&P operators have started evaluating and implementing enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology to extract the remaining oil after primary and secondary recoveries

  • Reservoir simulation study outcomes which consist of water alternating gas (WAG) incremental recovery factor and the thirteen parameters were input to the regression and group method of data handling (GMDH) models

  • One factor at time (OFAT) study and WAG literature reviews demonstrated that few parameters have an impact on the recovery factor trend and ultimate value as it was case for horizontal permeability and injected gas volume

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the decline in the production rate of petroleum reservoirs and increase in energy demand, E&P operators have started evaluating and implementing enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology to extract the remaining oil after primary and secondary recoveries (i.e., waterflooding, gas injection). The WAG injection process in oil fields has shown an increase in the recovery factor typically ranging from 5 to 10% over water or gas injection (Christensen et al 2001). Technical study usually starts by coreflood experiment, followed by complex reservoir model construction, and WAG pilot test to calibrate the expected WAG performance. Afzali et al (2018) demonstrated that the complexity of the WAG physical process is mainly related to three-phase flow, inter-phase mass transfer, swelling, oil trapping, and water blocking by the injected gas that are not well understood by scientist and researchers. The selected reservoir modeling study parameters and ranges are based on literature review of published WAG pilot projects and WAG studies, plus one factor at time (OFAT) sensitivity. The list of selected sensitivity parameters are horizontal permeability, vertical permeability, oil gravity, gas gravity, water viscosity, solution gas–oil ratio, WAG ratio, WAG cycle, land coefficient, and residual oil saturation to gas

Research methodology
Results and discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call