Abstract
Taking the wildly conflicting critical evaluations of Elizabeth Bowen's final novel, Eva Trout, or Changing Scenes (1969) as its starting-point, this essay argues against ‘interpreting’ both the novel and its ‘monstrous’ heroine in conventional representational terms, to argue, instead, for an appreciation, or experience, of both novel and protagonist as instantiations of a process of becoming along Deleuzian lines. Rather than seeing Bowen's final novel as a (failed) attempt to do what the Anglo-Irish writer's previous work would have suggested this text to do as well, the novel and its eponymous heroine are approached as Bowen's rigorously ethical effort to, first, obviate the opposition between living and writing, and second, to show, rather than claim, that art and life are indissolubly connected. Drawing on both Gilles Deleuze's notion of the ‘traitor-prophet’, whose function is to call both the world of dominant signification and the established order into question, and on Deleuze's counterpart Félix Guattari's concept of the work of art as an activity of ‘unframing’, the article ultimately suggests that the novel's effect, beyond representation and, indeed, through its own and its protagonist's language, is the ‘undoing’ of the reader, opening up a realm of virtual becoming that is neither reassuring nor to be captured in the chains of signification.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.