Abstract
I. Lack of focus in discussion of policy, 73. — Limiting assumptions necessary to achieve focus, 75. — II. Political assumptions stated, indicating probable continuance of general policy, 75. — III. Relative laxity of past enforcement, 78. — Changes of emphasis in discussions of policy, 81. — Continuing importance of problems emphasized in earlier discussions, 82. — IV. Possible changes in substantive law to provide more effective enforcement, 84. — V. Present deficiencies in administration, 89. — Possible improvement of administration, 90. — VI. Methods of making exceptions to anti-trust policy, 93. — Limits upon use of consent decrees, 97. — Legislative approach to exemption of particular industries, 98. — VII. Anti-trust law policy not archaic, 100. — Does not imply government of narrow powers, 101. — Greater effectiveness possible, 101.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
