Abstract

The present Standardization Rules recommend that one-third of the “short-circuit core loss” be taken as stray loss for the computation of efficiency of synchronous machines. An analysis of short-circuit tests of quite a variety of machines indicates that this is too small an amount and it is recommended that the Standardization Rules be revised to include a greater part of the “short-circuit core loss” as stray loss. The tests show that in the case of slow or moderate-speed machines practically all of the short-circuit loss can be accounted for by armature resistance loss plus eddy current loss, and that there is very little short-circuit loss in the armature core in case it is well built. In the case of high-speed turbogenerators there is a large loss appearing on short circuit which cannot be accounted for by eddy currents in the conductors. A large portion of this is due to eddy current and hysteresis loss in the un-laminated parts of the machine. An additional reason for taking more of the “short-circuit core loss” as stray loss in the case of a turbogenerator is that there is probably an appreciable additional loss with actual load on account of increased magnetic leakage from the field resulting from the increased excitation required.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call