Abstract
The acclaimed merits of analytical solutions based on a fictitious time developed in the 1970’s were partially overvalued due to a common misuse of classical analytical solutions based on the physical time that were taken as reference. With the main problem of the artificial satellite theory as a model, we carry out a more objective comparison of both kinds of theories. We find that the proper initialization of classical solutions notably balances the performance of the two distinct approaches in what respects to accuracy. Besides, extension of both kinds of satellite theories to higher orders show additional pros and cons of each different perturbation approach, thus providing complementary information to prospective users on which kind of analytical solution may better support their needs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
