Abstract

Recently A. Aiba (J. Number Theory 102 (2003) 118) gave a criterion whether the valuation ring of a wildly ramified Artin–Schreier extension of F q ( ( T ) ) is isomorphic to the associated order of this extension. We correct a mistake of (Aiba (2003)) and give easier substitutes for the (modified) condition of that criterion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call