Abstract

A result in a recent paper Huang et al. (2010) is incorrect because job processing times are variable due to both deteriorating jobs and learning effects, which is not taken into account by the authors. In this note, we show by a counter-example that the published result is incorrect. From the counter-example, we know that the classical SPT rule or LPT rule cannot give an optimal solution for the problem 1pj[r]=pj(1+∑i=1r-1pi)aαr-1,wj=θpj∑wjCj, then we provide a revised model.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.