Note: A simple picture of subdiffusive polymer motion from stochastic simulations

Abstract

Entangled polymer solutions and melts exhibit unusual frictional properties. In the entanglement limit self-diffusion coefficient of long flexible polymers decays with the second power of chain length and viscosity increases with 3–3.5 power of chain length.1 It is very difficult to provide detailed molecular-level explanation of the entanglement effect.2 Perhaps, the problem of many entangled polymer chains is the most complex multibody issue of classical physics. There are different approaches to polymer melt dynamics. Some of these recognize hydrodynamic interactions as a dominant term, while topological constraints for polymer chains are assumed as a secondary factor.3,4 Other theories consider the topological constraints as the most important factors controlling polymer dynamics. Herman and co-workers describe polymer dynamics in melts, as a lateral sliding of a chain along other5,6 chains until complete mutual disentanglement. Despite the success in explaining the power-laws for viscosity, the model has some limitations. First of all, memory effects are ignored, that is, polymer segments are treated independently. Also, each entanglement/obstacle is treated as a separate entity, which is certainly a simplification of the memory effect problem. In addition to that, correlated motions of segments are addressed within the framework of renormalized Rouse-chain theory,7 without calling any topological entanglements in advance. This approach leads to the generalized Langevin equation characterized by distinct memory kernels describing local and nonlocal segment correlations8–10 or to the Smoluchowski equation in which the segments’ mobility is treated as a stochastic variable.11 Both models describe the polymer segments motion at a microscopic level. An interesting alternative is to solve the integrodifferential equation for the chain relaxation with a sophisticated kernel function.12 The design of the kernel function is based on a mesoscopic description of the polymer melt. These theories explain some experimental data, although the description of the crossover between the Rouse and non-Rouse behavior is not satisfactory. Obviously, within the scope of a short note we cannot review all theoretical concepts of the polymer melt dynamics. Here we focus just on the interpretation of the observed single segment autocorrelation function.