Abstract

After integrating classic and cutting-edge research, we proposed a unified model that attempts to explain the key steps of mammalian retinal neurogenesis. We proposed that the Notch signaling-induced lateral inhibition mechanism promotes oscillatory expression of Hes1. Oscillating Hes1 inhibitory activity as a result leads to oscillatory expression of Notch signaling inhibitors, activators/inhibitors of retinal neuronal phenotypes, and cell cycle-promoting genes all within a retinal progenitor cell (RPC). We provided a mechanism explaining not only how oscillatory expression prevents the progenitor-to-precursor transition, but also how this transition happens. Our proposal of the mechanism posits that the levels of the above factors not only oscillate but also rise (with the exception of Hes1) as the factors accumulate within a progenitor. Depending on which factors accumulate fastest and reach the required supra-threshold levels (cell cycle activators or Notch signaling inhibitors), the progenitor either proliferates or begins to differentiate without any further proliferation when Notch signaling ceases. Thus, oscillatory gene expression may regulate an RPC’s decision to proliferate or differentiate. Meanwhile, a post-mitotic precursor’s selection of one retinal neuronal phenotype over many others depends on the expression level of key transcription factors (activators) required for each of these retinal neuronal phenotypes. Because the events described above are stochastic due to oscillatory gene expression and gene product inheritance from a mother RPC after its division, an RPC or precursor’s decision requires the assignment of probabilities to specific outcomes in the selection process. While low and sustained (non-oscillatory) Notch signaling activity is required to promote the transition of retinal progenitors into various retinal neuronal phenotypes, we propose that the lateral inhibition mechanism, combined with high expression of the BMP signaling-induced Inhibitor of Differentiation (ID) protein family, promotes high and sustained (non-oscillatory) Hes1 and Hes5 expression. These events facilitate the transition of an RPC into the Müller glia (MG) phenotype at the late stage of retinal development.

Highlights

  • The number of people suffering from retinal diseases is projected to increase significantly in the coming decades, especially as the population of elderly patients continues to grow (Rosenberg and Sperazza, 2008; Akpek and Smith, 2013)

  • While low and sustained Notch signaling activity is required to promote the transition of retinal progenitors into various retinal neuronal phenotypes, we propose that the lateral inhibition mechanism, combined with high expression of the BMP signalinginduced Inhibitor of Differentiation (ID) protein family, promotes high and sustained Hes1 and Hes5 expression

  • The reduced Notch signaling activity will generate a positive feedback loop—due to the absence of Hes1-mediated inhibition of X expression—that facilitates the sharp transition from the progenitor state to the precursor state; we refer to this as a molecular ‘‘switch.’’ In the section entitled ‘‘Putative mechanisms regulating the transition of retinal cells from the proliferative progenitor state to the post-mitotic precursor state,’’ we provided some examples using real genes and published evidence

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The number of people suffering from retinal diseases is projected to increase significantly in the coming decades, especially as the population of elderly patients continues to grow (Rosenberg and Sperazza, 2008; Akpek and Smith, 2013). We propose that oscillatory gene expression prevents an RPC’s transition from the proliferative progenitor state to the post-mitotic precursor state, but allows the expression of Notch signaling inhibitors, activators/inhibitors of retinal neuronal phenotypes, and cell cycle-promoting genes—since inhibitory Hes (and Hes, as part of the GRN) activity oscillates from high to low. This hypothesis can explain the extensive heterogeneity of gene expression observed in individual RPCs (Trimarchi et al, 2008; Cepko, 2014). The role of Hes (and Hes5) in promoting and stabilizing the MG phenotype requires further research using various types of approaches, including epigenetic (ChIP-seq analysis, etc.)

DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call