Not Your Usual Pre-Excitation.

Abstract

HomeCirculationVol. 135, No. 18Not Your Usual Pre-Excitation Free AccessCase ReportPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessCase ReportPDF/EPUBNot Your Usual Pre-Excitation Rajat Goyal, MD, Abhijeet Singh, MD and Roger Fan, MD Rajat GoyalRajat Goyal Search for more papers by this author , Abhijeet SinghAbhijeet Singh Search for more papers by this author and Roger FanRoger Fan Search for more papers by this author Originally published2 May 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028386Circulation. 2017;135:1759–1761ECG ChallengeA 67-year-old man with a medical history of moderate to severe mitral regurgitation secondary to flail posterior mitral valve leaflet, hypertension, type II non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was found to have the following ECG (Figure 1) after elective mitral valve repair. What abnormalities are present? Do you recommend further testing or treatment?Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. ECG obtained after elective mitral valve repair.Please turn the page to read the diagnosis.Response to ECG ChallengeThe ECG (Figure 2) demonstrates normal sinus rhythm with pre-excitation but unexpectedly with progressively lengthening PR interval consistent with Mobitz I (Wenckebach) block. The seventh QRS complex (arrow) is a junctional escape beat that occurs simultaneously with a nonconducted P wave. Prominent delta waves are seen with all QRS complexes without a change in the degree of pre-excitation despite progressive atrioventricular block or with junctional escapes. In addition, there are nonconducted P waves. These findings demonstrate that the level of pre-excitation is below the level of the atrioventricular node. This ECG is therefore consistent with the diagnosis of a fasciculoventricular accessory pathway (FVAP).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. ECG findings. Sinus rhythm with fixed preexcitation and Mobitz I block. Arrow indicates a junctional escape beat with the same degree of pre-excitation. These findings confirm the presence of a fasciculoventricular accessory pathway.FVAPs are a rare occurrence, with an incidence of 1.2% to 5.1% of all pre-excitation syndromes.1 They take off below the atrioventricular node (from the His bundle or bundle branches) and insert directly into the ventricular septum, resulting in pre-excitation that is often subtle.2A surface ECG on its own is rarely able to differentiate between pre-excitation due to a typical atrioventricular accessory pathway and that from an FVAP, especially in patients with anteroseptal or midseptal bypass tracts.2 In a typical accessory pathway, atrioventricular nodal Wenckebach is usually not seen because it is masked by brisk antegrade conduction over the accessory pathway, resulting in a fixed P wave–to–delta wave time. No blocked P waves are seen either because there is always an alternative route to the ventricle. In patients with an FVAP, however, 3 specific ECG findings are seen. First, there is a fixed amount of pre-excitation despite progressive atrioventricular delay. Second, atrioventricular nodal block leads to an absence of atrioventricular conduction (ie, a dropped P wave). Last, when present, premature junctional beats (or junctional escape complexes) will exhibit the same degree of pre-excitation as sinus beats. The 3 findings taken together confirm that pre-excitation occurs below the level of the atrioventricular node and therefore the presence of an FVAP.Clinically, FVAPs are benign and have not been implicated in any arrhythmias.3 There is also no concern for 1-to-1 conduction of atrial fibrillation because the atrioventricular node is present to protect against this. Hence, no further clinical testing is required.3 This patient actually first presented with pre-excited atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response at the time of his diagnosis of flail mitral leaflet. Before surgery, he underwent electrophysiological study in which FVAP was diagnosed. No ablation was performed given the favorable prognosis associated with this diagnosis.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCirculation is available at http://circ.ahajournals.org.Correspondence to: Roger Fan, MD, Stony Brook University Hospital, Heart Rhythm Center, HSC T16-080, Stony Brook, NY 11794. E-mail [email protected]